mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Developing and Maintaining an Open-Source Repository of AI Evaluations: Challenges and Insights

arXiv 2507.06893 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AI evaluations have become critical tools for assessing large language model capabilities and safety. This paper presents practical insights from eight months of maintaining inspectevals, an open-source repository of 70+ community-contributed AI evaluations. We identify key challenges in implementing and maintaining AI evaluations and develop solutions including: (1) a structured cohort management framework for scaling community contributions, (2) statistical methodologies for optimal resampling and cross-model comparison with uncertainty quantification, and (3) systematic quality control processes for reproducibility. Our analysis reveals that AI evaluation requires specialized infrastructure, statistical rigor, and community coordination beyond traditional software development practices.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2025.

Builds on

6 of 13 references.

References · 6

  1. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  2. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,128
  3. 2024AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agentscited by 437
  4. 2024Cybench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities and Risks of Language Modelscited by 164
  5. 2024Adding Error Bars to Evals: A Statistical Approach to Language Model Evaluationscited by 148
  6. 2025General Scales Unlock AI Evaluation with Explanatory and Predictive Powercited by 31

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.