mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Civil Society in the Loop: Feedback-Driven Adaptation of (L)LM-Assisted Classification in an Open-Source Telegram Monitoring Tool

arXiv 2507.06734 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2025cs.HC cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The role of civil society organizations (CSOs) in monitoring harmful online content is increasingly crucial, especially as platform providers reduce their investment in content moderation. AI tools can assist in detecting and monitoring harmful content at scale. However, few open-source tools offer seamless integration of AI models and social media monitoring infrastructures. Given their thematic expertise and contextual understanding of harmful content, CSOs should be active partners in co-developing technological tools, providing feedback, helping to improve models, and ensuring alignment with stakeholder needs and values, rather than as passive 'consumers'. However, collaborations between the open source community, academia, and civil society remain rare, and research on harmful content seldom translates into practical tools usable by civil society actors. This work in progress explores how CSOs can be meaningfully involved in an AI-assisted open-source monitoring tool of anti-democratic movements on Telegram, which we are currently developing in collaboration with CSO stakeholders.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2025.

Builds on

7 of 16 references.

References · 7

  1. 2022Human and technological infrastructures of fact-checkingcited by 16
  2. 2024The Impact and Opportunities of Generative AI in Fact-Checkingcited by 10
  3. 2023Some Observations on Fact-Checking Work with Implications for Computational Supportcited by 9
  4. 2024The Impact of Example Selection in Few-Shot Prompting on Automated Essay Scoring Using GPT Modelscited by 8
  5. 2022Autonomation, Not Automation: Activities and Needs of European Fact-checkers as a Basis for Designing Human-Centered AI Systemscited by 7
  6. 2022Telegram Monitor: Monitoring Brazilian Political Groups and Channels on Telegramcited by 2
  7. 2024TelegramScrap: A comprehensive tool for scraping Telegram datacited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025WATCHED: A Web AI Agent Tool for Combating Hate Speech by Expanding Data
  2. 2026Characterizing Bluesky Content Moderation Service: From Automation of Service to Landscape of Harms
  3. 2024Safeguarding Decentralized Social Media: LLM Agents for Automating Community Rule Compliance
  4. 2022Addressing contingency in algorithmic (mis)information classification: Toward a responsible machine learning agenda
  5. 2025Watching the AI Watchdogs: A Fairness and Robustness Analysis of AI Safety Moderation Classifiers
  6. 2024Counterspeakers' Perspectives: Unveiling Barriers and AI Needs in the Fight against Online Hate
  7. 2026Wisdom of the LLM Crowd: A Large Scale Benchmark of Multi-Label U.S. Election-Related Harmful Social Media Content
  8. 2023"HOT" ChatGPT: The promise of ChatGPT in detecting and discriminating hateful, offensive, and toxic comments on social media