mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

OpenFActScore: Open-Source Atomic Evaluation of Factuality in Text Generation

arXiv 2507.05965 ↗First posted 8 Jul 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce OpenFActScore, an open-source implementation of the FActScore framework for evaluating the factuality of text generated by large language models (LLMs). FActScore evaluates the factual accuracy of long-form text by using Atomic Fact Generation (AFG) to extract individual factual claims and Atomic Fact Validation (AFV) to verify each claim against a trusted knowledge source. While the original FActScore relies on closed-source and commercial models such as InstructGPT and ChatGPT, OpenFActScore enables the use of any Hugging Face-compatible model for both AFG and AFV. We provide a detailed technical overview of our implementation, highlighting design choices and modifications made to support open models. We evaluate multiple open-source LLMs on both AFG and AFV using the original FActScore benchmark, reporting BERTScore-F1 for AFG and Error Rate relative to human annotations for AFV. Our results show that open models can approximate the performance of closed-source systems, with Gemma achieving the best overall performance, and our final setup obtains a 0.99 Pearson correlation with the original FActScore experiments. OpenFActScore promotes transparency, reproducibility, and cost-effective evaluation, and is available at: https://github.com/lflage/OpenFActScore.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2025.

Builds on

18 of 28 references.

References · 18

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  4. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
  5. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
  6. 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,282
  7. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 868
  8. 2021Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrieverscited by 456
  9. 2020FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 293
  10. 2022Revisiting the Gold Standard: Grounding Summarization Evaluation with Robust Human Evaluationcited by 142
  11. 2021Hallucinated but Factual! Inspecting the Factuality of Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 129
  12. 2023LongEval: Guidelines for Human Evaluation of Faithfulness in Long-form Summarizationcited by 96
6 more
  1. 2020Controlled Hallucinations: Learning to Generate Faithfully from Noisy Datacited by 84
  2. 2024Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating the Reasoning Behavior of Large Language Models -- A Surveycited by 83
  3. 2020Knowledge Graph-Augmented Abstractive Summarization with Semantic-Driven Cloze Rewardcited by 66
  4. 2021Finding a Balanced Degree of Automation for Summary Evaluationcited by 43
  5. 2019Crowdsourcing Lightweight Pyramids for Manual Summary Evaluationcited by 39
  6. 2023Factored Verification: Detecting and Reducing Hallucination in Summaries of Academic Paperscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.