mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Self-Review Framework for Enhancing Instruction Following Capability of LLM

arXiv 2507.05598 ↗First posted 8 Jul 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Various techniques have been proposed to improve large language models (LLMs) adherence to formatting and instruction constraints. One of the most effective approaches involves utilizing high-quality data generated by powerful models. However, such models often fail to fully comply with complex instructions in a single generation. To address this limitation, iterative revision methods have been introduced. Nevertheless, as the number of data points and revision iterations increases, the associated monetary costs grow significantly. As a resource-efficient alternative, methods have been proposed that leverage high-performance evaluation tools to compensate for the limited self-evaluation capabilities of open-source LLMs. However, these approaches often lead to a degradation in output quality due to excessive revision. To overcome these challenges, we propose Re5, a self-evaluation and revision framework designed to enhance instruction-following performance while preserving the quality of the generated content. Re5 extracts task and constraint components from user instructions, performs structural evaluations to prevent error accumulation, and applies fine-grained constraint-specific content evaluations followed by selective revisions. This process ensures precise and quality-preserving improvements. The final high-quality outputs are used for alignment tuning, enabling long-term alignment improvements through a data-centric iterative refinement loop. Experimental results demonstrate that Re5 achieves instruction-following performance comparable to models trained on data generated by GPT-4o-mini, a high-performance model, even with a small amount of data while maintaining response quality with a 64.24%-win rate over the non-revised initial responses. These results validate Re5 as an efficient and effective solution for enhancing instruction adherence with minimal external supervision.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2025.

Builds on

17 of 22 references.

References · 17

  1. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  2. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  3. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  4. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
  5. 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 686
  6. 2021XL-Sum: Large-Scale Multilingual Abstractive Summarization for 44 Languagescited by 347
  7. 2024Same Task, More Tokens: the Impact of Input Length on the Reasoning Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 152
  8. 2023FollowBench: A Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 117
  9. 2024Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Followingcited by 102
  10. 2024Found in the Middle: Calibrating Positional Attention Bias Improves Long Context Utilizationcited by 101
  11. 2023Controlled Text Generation with Natural Language Instructionscited by 87
  12. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models on Controlled Generation Taskscited by 73
5 more
  1. 2023COLLIE: Systematic Construction of Constrained Text Generation Taskscited by 70
  2. 2024LLM Self-Correction with DeCRIM: Decompose, Critique, and Refine for Enhanced Following of Instructions with Multiple Constraintscited by 35
  3. 2023Bounding the Capabilities of Large Language Models in Open Text Generation with Prompt Constraintscited by 31
  4. 2024Distance between Relevant Information Pieces Causes Bias in Long-Context LLMscited by 16
  5. 2024Divide-Verify-Refine: Can LLMs Self-Align with Complex Instructions?cited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.