mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Machine Learning from Explanations

arXiv 2507.04788 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Acquiring and training on large-scale labeled data can be impractical due to cost constraints. Additionally, the use of small training datasets can result in considerable variability in model outcomes, overfitting, and learning of spurious correlations. A crucial shortcoming of data labels is their lack of any reasoning behind a specific label assignment, causing models to learn any arbitrary classification rule as long as it aligns data with labels. To overcome these issues, we introduce an innovative approach for training reliable classification models on smaller datasets, by using simple explanation signals such as important input features from labeled data. Our method centers around a two-stage training cycle that alternates between enhancing model prediction accuracy and refining its attention to match the explanations. This instructs models to grasp the rationale behind label assignments during their learning phase. We demonstrate that our training cycle expedites the convergence towards more accurate and reliable models, particularly for small, class-imbalanced training data, or data with spurious features.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2025.

Builds on

23 of 32 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  4. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
  5. 2021Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolutioncited by 1,215
  6. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  7. 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 488
  8. 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 379
  9. 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
  10. 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
  11. 2020Pushing the Limits of Semi-Supervised Learning for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 185
  12. 2021Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracycited by 177
11 more
  1. 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 144
  2. 2020Making deep neural networks right for the right scientific reasons by interacting with their explanationscited by 141
  3. 2020Evaluating Explanations: How much do explanations from the teacher aid students?cited by 94
  4. 2020Coping with Label Shift via Distributionally Robust Optimisationcited by 69
  5. 2019Incorporating Priors with Feature Attribution on Text Classificationcited by 68
  6. 2021Improving Deep Learning Interpretability by Saliency Guided Trainingcited by 68
  7. 2018Deriving Machine Attention from Human Rationalescited by 54
  8. 2021Do Input Gradients Highlight Discriminative Features?cited by 52
  9. 2022Optimizing Relevance Maps of Vision Transformers Improves Robustnesscited by 41
  10. 2019Learning Credible Deep Neural Networks with Rationale Regularizationcited by 18
  11. 2021Agree to Disagree: When Deep Learning Models With Identical Architectures Produce Distinct Explanationscited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.