Constructive Universal Approximation and Sure Convergence for Multi-Layer Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose o1Neuro, a new neural network model built on sparse indicator activation neurons, with two key statistical properties. (1) Constructive universal approximation: At the population level, a deep o1Neuro can approximate any measurable function of boldsymbolX, while a shallow o1Neuro suffices for additive models with two-way interaction components, including XOR and univariate terms, assuming boldsymbolX ∈ [0,1]p has bounded density. Combined with prior work showing that a single-hidden-layer non-sparse network is a universal approximator, this highlights a trade-off between activation sparsity and network depth in approximation capability. (2) Sure convergence: At the sample level, the optimization of o1Neuro reaches an optimal model with probability approaching one after sufficiently many update rounds, and we provide an example showing that the required number of updates is well bounded under linear data-generating models. Empirically, o1Neuro is compared with XGBoost, Random Forests, and TabNet for learning complex regression functions with interactions, demonstrating superior predictive performance on several benchmark datasets from OpenML and the UCI Machine Learning Repository with n = 10000, as well as on synthetic datasets with 100 ≤ n ≤ 20000.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2025.
Builds on
27 of 60 references.
References · 27
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 640
- 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 572
- 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 530
- 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 523
- 2018A Mean Field View of the Landscape of Two-Layers Neural Networkscited by 463
- 2017Nonparametric regression using deep neural networks with ReLU activation functioncited by 431
- 2014The Loss Surfaces of Multilayer Networkscited by 278
- 2016Benefits of depth in neural networkscited by 248
- 2019Generalization Bounds of Stochastic Gradient Descent for Wide and Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
15 more
- 2023When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?cited by 218
- 2019Mean-field theory of two-layers neural networks: dimension-free bounds and kernel limitcited by 187
- 2020A Simple Convergence Proof of Adam and Adagradcited by 169
- 2018Optimal approximation of continuous functions by very deep ReLU networkscited by 165
- 2022A Kernel-Based View of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 118
- 2022Adam Can Converge Without Any Modification On Update Rulescited by 112
- 2023Convergence of Adam Under Relaxed Assumptionscited by 97
- 2019Convergence rates for the stochastic gradient descent method for non-convex objective functionscited by 66
- 2017FreezeOut: Accelerate Training by Progressively Freezing Layerscited by 54
- 2020The gap between theory and practice in function approximation with deep neural networkscited by 53
- 2019A Selective Overview of Deep Learningcited by 31
- 2021Proof of the Theory-to-Practice Gap in Deep Learning via Sampling Complexity bounds for Neural Network Approximation Spacescited by 30
- 2021A proof of convergence for the gradient descent optimization method with random initializations in the training of neural networks with ReLU activation for piecewise linear target functionscited by 10
- 2024Non-convergence to global minimizers for Adam and stochastic gradient descent optimization and constructions of local minimizers in the training of artificial neural networkscited by 9
- 2017Optimization by gradient boostingcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.