mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dude, where's my utterance? Evaluating the effects of automatic segmentation and transcription on CPS detection

arXiv 2507.04454 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2025cs.HC cs.CL cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Collaborative Problem-Solving (CPS) markers capture key aspects of effective teamwork, such as staying on task, avoiding interruptions, and generating constructive ideas. An AI system that reliably detects these markers could help teachers identify when a group is struggling or demonstrating productive collaboration. Such a system requires an automated pipeline composed of multiple components. In this work, we evaluate how CPS detection is impacted by automating two critical components: transcription and speech segmentation. On the public Weights Task Dataset (WTD), we find CPS detection performance with automated transcription and segmentation methods is comparable to human-segmented and manually transcribed data; however, we find the automated segmentation methods reduces the number of utterances by 26.5%, impacting the the granularity of the data. We discuss the implications for developing AI-driven tools that support collaborative learning in classrooms.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2025.

Builds on

2 of 29 references.

References · 2

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2024Any Other Thoughts, Hedgehog? Linking Deliberation Chains in Collaborative Dialoguescited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.