Time-critical and confidence-based abstraction dropping methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
One paradigm of Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) improvements is to build and use state and/or action abstractions during the tree search. Non-exact abstractions, however, introduce an approximation error making convergence to the optimal action in the abstract space impossible. Hence, as proposed as a component of Elastic Monte Carlo Tree Search by Xu et al., abstraction algorithms should eventually drop the abstraction. In this paper, we propose two novel abstraction dropping schemes, namely OGA-IAAD and OGA-CAD which can yield clear performance improvements whilst being safe in the sense that the dropping never causes any notable performance degradations contrary to Xu's dropping method. OGA-IAAD is designed for time critical settings while OGA-CAD is designed to improve the MCTS performance with the same number of iterations.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2025.
Builds on
0 of 18 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4.
4 papers.
- 2025AUPO -- Abstracted Until Proven Otherwise: A Reward Distribution Based Abstraction Algorithmcited by 3
- 2025Investigating Intra-Abstraction Policies For Non-exact Abstraction Algorithmscited by 2
- 2025Grouping Nodes With Known Value Differences: A Lossless UCT-based Abstraction Algorithmcited by 1
- 2025Discovering State Equivalences in UCT Search Trees By Action Pruningcited by 0
- 2025Discovering State Equivalences in UCT Search Trees By Action Pruning30 Oct 2025
- 2025Grouping Nodes With Known Value Differences: A Lossless UCT-based Abstraction Algorithm29 Oct 2025
- 2025Investigating Intra-Abstraction Policies For Non-exact Abstraction Algorithms28 Oct 2025
- 2025AUPO -- Abstracted Until Proven Otherwise: A Reward Distribution Based Abstraction Algorithm27 Oct 2025