On Design Principles for Private Adaptive Optimizers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The spherical noise added to gradients in differentially private (DP) training undermines the performance of adaptive optimizers like AdaGrad and Adam, and hence many recent works have proposed algorithms to address this challenge. However, the empirical results in these works focus on simple tasks and models and the conclusions may not generalize to model training in practice. In this paper we survey several of these variants, and develop better theoretical intuition for them as well as perform empirical studies comparing them. We find that a common intuition of aiming for unbiased estimates of second moments of gradients in adaptive optimizers is misguided, and instead that a simple technique called scale-then-privatize (which does not achieve unbiased second moments) has more desirable theoretical behaviors and outperforms all other variants we study on a small-scale language model training task. We additionally argue that scale-then-privatize causes the noise addition to better match the application of correlated noise mechanisms which are more desirable to use in practice.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2025.
Builds on
16 of 23 references.
References · 16
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
- 2021Practical and Private (Deep) Learning without Sampling or Shufflingcited by 169
- 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 150
- 2022Position: Considerations for Differentially Private Learning with Large-Scale Public Pretrainingcited by 86
- 2022Improved Differential Privacy for SGD via Optimal Private Linear Operators on Adaptive Streamscited by 59
- 2023(Amplified) Banded Matrix Factorization: A unified approach to private trainingcited by 49
- 2022Multi-Epoch Matrix Factorization Mechanisms for Private Machine Learningcited by 48
- 2022Private Adaptive Optimization with Side Informationcited by 38
- 2023DP-AdamBC: Your DP-Adam Is Actually DP-SGD (Unless You Apply Bias Correction)cited by 28
- 2024Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with User-Level Differential Privacycited by 28
4 more
- 2021Adapting to Function Difficulty and Growth Conditions in Private Optimizationcited by 19
- 2022Differentially Private Adaptive Optimization with Delayed Preconditionerscited by 18
- 2024Scaling up the Banded Matrix Factorization Mechanism for Differentially Private MLcited by 12
- 2025Continual Release Moment Estimation with Differential Privacycited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025Normalized Square Root: Sharper Matrix Factorization Bounds for Differentially Private Continual Countingcited by 3
- 2025Correlating Cross-Iteration Noise for DP-SGD using Model Curvaturecited by 1
- 2025Cocoon: A System Architecture for Differentially Private Training with Correlated Noisescited by 1
- 2025DP-MicroAdam: Private and Frugal Algorithm for Training and Fine-tuningcited by 1
- 2026Adaptive Methods Are Preferable in High Privacy Settings: An SDE Perspectivecited by 1
- 2026DP-KFC: Data-Free Preconditioning for Privacy-Preserving Deep Learningcited by 0
- 2026DP-KFC: Data-Free Preconditioning for Privacy-Preserving Deep Learning13 May 2026
- 2026Adaptive Methods Are Preferable in High Privacy Settings: An SDE Perspective3 Mar 2026
- 2025DP-MicroAdam: Private and Frugal Algorithm for Training and Fine-tuning25 Nov 2025
- 2025Cocoon: A System Architecture for Differentially Private Training with Correlated Noises8 Oct 2025
- 2025Correlating Cross-Iteration Noise for DP-SGD using Model Curvature6 Oct 2025
- 2025Normalized Square Root: Sharper Matrix Factorization Bounds for Differentially Private Continual Counting17 Sep 2025