Provenance Tracking in Large-Scale Machine Learning Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As the demand for large scale AI models continues to grow, the optimization of their training to balance computational efficiency, execution time, accuracy and energy consumption represents a critical multidimensional challenge. Achieving this balance requires not only innovative algorithmic techniques and hardware architectures but also comprehensive tools for monitoring, analyzing, and understanding the underlying processes involved in model training and deployment. Provenance data information about the origins, context, and transformations of data and processes has become a key component in this pursuit. By leveraging provenance, researchers and engineers can gain insights into resource usage patterns, identify inefficiencies, and ensure reproducibility and accountability in AI development workflows. For this reason, the question of how distributed resources can be optimally utilized to scale large AI models in an energy efficient manner is a fundamental one. To support this effort, we introduce the yProv4ML library, a tool designed to collect provenance data in JSON format, compliant with the W3C PROV and ProvML standards. yProv4ML focuses on flexibility and extensibility, and enables users to integrate additional data collection tools via plugins. The library is fully integrated with the yProv framework, allowing for higher level pairing in tasks run also through workflow management systems.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2025.
Builds on
14 of 46 references.
References · 14
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2021Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolutioncited by 1,228
- 2023Scaling Data-Constrained Language Modelscited by 403
- 2019Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learningcited by 265
- 2022Leakage and the Reproducibility Crisis in ML-based Sciencecited by 65
- 2021Packaging research artefacts with RO-Cratecited by 24
- 2018ML-Schema: Exposing the Semantics of Machine Learning with Schemas and Ontologiescited by 15
- 2019Provenance Data in the Machine Learning Lifecycle in Computational Science and Engineeringcited by 13
- 2020Workflow Provenance in the Lifecycle of Scientific Machine Learningcited by 9
- 2023Recording provenance of workflow runs with RO-Cratecited by 9
- 2023Towards Lightweight Data Integration using Multi-workflow Provenance and Data Observabilitycited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2026Towards Security-Auditable LLM Agents: A Unified Graph Representationcited by 6
- 2026LEDGER: Claim-to-Evidence Trace Graphs for Auditing LLM Agentscited by 5
- 2025AI4EOSC: a Federated Cloud Platform for Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Researchcited by 0
- 2026AuditWeave: A Tamper-Evident, Auditor-Navigable Evidence Layer for AI-Assisted and Data-Transformation Workflowscited by 0
- 2026Workflow Cards: Structured Summaries of Workflow Executions Using Provenance Datacited by 0
- 2026LEDGER: Claim-to-Evidence Trace Graphs for Auditing LLM Agents19 Aug 2026
- 2026Workflow Cards: Structured Summaries of Workflow Executions Using Provenance Data11 Aug 2026
- 2026AuditWeave: A Tamper-Evident, Auditor-Navigable Evidence Layer for AI-Assisted and Data-Transformation Workflows14 Jun 2026
- 2026Towards Security-Auditable LLM Agents: A Unified Graph Representation7 May 2026
- 2025AI4EOSC: a Federated Cloud Platform for Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Research18 Dec 2025