An Uncertainty-Aware Dynamic Decision Framework for Progressive Multi-Omics Integration in Classification Tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Background and Objective: High-throughput multi-omics technologies have proven invaluable for elucidating disease mechanisms and enabling early diagnosis. However, the high cost of multi-omics profiling imposes a significant economic burden, with over reliance on full omics data potentially leading to unnecessary resource consumption. To address these issues, we propose an uncertainty-aware, multi-view dynamic decision framework for omics data classification that aims to achieve high diagnostic accuracy while minimizing testing costs. Methodology: At the single-omics level, we refine the activation functions of neural networks to generate Dirichlet distribution parameters, utilizing subjective logic to quantify both the belief masses and uncertainty mass of classification results. Belief mass reflects the support of a specific omics modality for a disease class, while the uncertainty parameter captures limitations in data quality and model discriminability, providing a more trustworthy basis for decision-making. At the multi omics level, we employ a fusion strategy based on Dempster-Shafer theory to integrate heterogeneous modalities, leveraging their complementarity to boost diagnostic accuracy and robustness. A dynamic decision mechanism is then applied that omics data are incrementally introduced for each patient until either all data sources are utilized or the model confidence exceeds a predefined threshold, potentially before all data sources are utilized. Results and Conclusion: We evaluate our approach on four benchmark multi-omics datasets, ROSMAP, LGG, BRCA, and KIPAN. In three datasets, over 50% of cases achieved accurate classification using a single omics modality, effectively reducing redundant testing. Meanwhile, our method maintains diagnostic performance comparable to full-omics models and preserves essential biological insights.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2025.
Builds on
14 of 47 references.
References · 14
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 732
- 2017Gated Multimodal Units for Information Fusioncited by 248
- 2022Trusted Multi-View Classification with Dynamic Evidential Fusioncited by 168
- 2020More Diverse Means Better: Multimodal Deep Learning Meets Remote Sensing Imagery Classificationcited by 126
- 2019DropConnect Is Effective in Modeling Uncertainty of Bayesian Deep Networkscited by 92
- 2023Uncertainty Estimation by Fisher Information-based Evidential Deep Learningcited by 58
- 2020Discrimination-aware Network Pruning for Deep Model Compressioncited by 51
- 2014Better prediction by use of co-data: Adaptive group-regularized ridge regressioncited by 18
- 2024Revisiting Essential and Nonessential Settings of Evidential Deep Learningcited by 15
- 2022Controlled Dropout for Uncertainty Estimationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.