mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Discovering Learning-Friendly Generation Orders for Sequential Computation

arXiv 2506.23875 ↗First posted 30 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sequential computation via autoregressive generation can make difficult tasks learnable, but the generation order of intermediate states strongly affects whether training succeeds. We address the problem of discovering a learning-friendly target order automatically, rather than relying on task-specific design. Our key observation is that learning-friendly orders cause a faster loss drop in the early stage of training. We exploit this by loss profiling, which ranks candidate orders by the early-stage loss of a single short run. To handle the factorial candidate space, we wrap loss profiling in a hierarchical global -- local search over block- and within-block-level orderings. On six order-sensitive tasks, the method discovers effective orders up to L=13 from random initialization and up to L=40 from structured initialization, lifting success rates from about 10% to near 100%. On integer multiplication, it rediscovers the reverse-digit order that was reported to be efficient in prior studies. On delay dynamical systems, as a case study of multi-variate recurrences, learnability varies sharply even among valid topological sorts of the dependency graph: loss profiling identifies a learning-friendly one, and the global search even discovers orders surpassing hand-designed candidates.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2025.

Builds on

23 of 29 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  2. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
  3. 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 629
  4. 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 425
  5. 2019Deep Learning for Symbolic Mathematicscited by 270
  6. 2023What Algorithms can Transformers Learn? A Study in Length Generalizationcited by 199
  7. 2021Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example Difficultycited by 141
  8. 2017Failures of Gradient-Based Deep Learningcited by 80
  9. 2024Transformers Can Do Arithmetic with the Right Embeddingscited by 78
  10. 2024Why are Sensitive Functions Hard for Transformers?cited by 74
  11. 2021Linear algebra with transformerscited by 63
  12. 2023Positional Description Matters for Transformers Arithmeticcited by 56
11 more
  1. 2019Non-Monotonic Sequential Text Generationcited by 55
  2. 2024Transformers Provably Solve Parity Efficiently with Chain of Thoughtcited by 50
  3. 2023Learning the greatest common divisor: explaining transformer predictionscited by 33
  4. 2024Global Lyapunov functions: a long-standing open problem in mathematics, with symbolic transformerscited by 29
  5. 2022SALSA: Attacking Lattice Cryptography with Transformerscited by 28
  6. 2023SALSA PICANTE: a machine learning attack on LWE with binary secretscited by 11
  7. 2023SALSA VERDE: a machine learning attack on Learning With Errors with sparse small secretscited by 8
  8. 2023Learning to Compute Gr"obner Basescited by 7
  9. 2025Computational Algebra with Attention: Transformer Oracles for Border Basis Algorithmscited by 7
  10. 2023Differences Between Hard and Noisy-labeled Samples: An Empirical Studycited by 4
  11. 2025Int2Int: a framework for mathematics with transformerscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.