RELATE: Subjective evaluation dataset for automatic evaluation of relevance between text and audio
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In text-to-audio (TTA) research, the relevance between input text and output audio is an important evaluation aspect. Traditionally, it has been evaluated from both subjective and objective perspectives. However, subjective evaluation is costly in terms of money and time, and objective evaluation is unclear regarding the correlation to subjective evaluation scores. In this study, we construct RELATE, an open-sourced dataset that subjectively evaluates the relevance. Also, we benchmark a model for automatically predicting the subjective evaluation score from synthesized audio. Our model outperforms a conventional CLAPScore model, and that trend extends to many sound categories.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026AQAScore: Evaluating Semantic Alignment in Text-to-Audio Generation via Audio Question Answeringcited by 8
- 2026MoEScore: Mixture-of-Experts-Based Text-Audio Relevance Score Prediction for Text-to-Audio System Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026CAF-Score: Calibrating CLAP with LALMs for Reference-free Audio Captioning Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026CAF-Score: Calibrating CLAP with LALMs for Reference-free Audio Captioning Evaluation20 Mar 2026
- 2026AQAScore: Evaluating Semantic Alignment in Text-to-Audio Generation via Audio Question Answering21 Jan 2026
- 2026MoEScore: Mixture-of-Experts-Based Text-Audio Relevance Score Prediction for Text-to-Audio System Evaluation11 Jan 2026