Report on NSF Workshop on Science of Safe AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in machine learning, particularly the emergence of foundation models, are leading to new opportunities to develop technology-based solutions to societal problems. However, the reasoning and inner workings of today's complex AI models are not transparent to the user, and there are no safety guarantees regarding their predictions. Consequently, to fulfill the promise of AI, we must address the following scientific challenge: how to develop AI-based systems that are not only accurate and performant but also safe and trustworthy? The criticality of safe operation is particularly evident for autonomous systems for control and robotics, and was the catalyst for the Safe Learning Enabled Systems (SLES) program at NSF. For the broader class of AI applications, such as users interacting with chatbots and clinicians receiving treatment recommendations, safety is, while no less important, less well-defined with context-dependent interpretations. This motivated the organization of a day-long workshop, held at University of Pennsylvania on February 26, 2025, to bring together investigators funded by the NSF SLES program with a broader pool of researchers studying AI safety. This report is the result of the discussions in the working groups that addressed different aspects of safety at the workshop. The report articulates a new research agenda focused on developing theory, methods, and tools that will provide the foundations of the next generation of AI-enabled systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2025.
Builds on
11 of 17 references.
References · 11
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
- 2024AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge Basescited by 429
- 2024Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 230
- 2024Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMscited by 173
- 2019Certified Robustness to Adversarial Word Substitutionscited by 168
- 2024Stealing Part of a Production Language Modelcited by 159
- 2023Can Sensitive Information Be Deleted From LLMs? Objectives for Defending Against Extraction Attackscited by 158
- 2024Efficient Adversarial Training in LLMs with Continuous Attackscited by 113
- 2024Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systemscited by 96
- 2024Scaling Trends for Data Poisoning in LLMscited by 30
- 2024Data Poisoning for In-context Learningcited by 21
Built on by
Not cited yet.