mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Grounding-Aware Token Pruning: Recovering from Drastic Performance Drops in Visual Grounding Caused by Pruning

arXiv 2506.21873 ↗First posted 27 Jun 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 9

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated strong performance in visual grounding, establishing themselves as a general interface for various vision-language applications. This progress has driven the development of token pruning methods to mitigate the high computational costs associated with processing numerous visual tokens. However, we observe that pruning significantly weakens the model's grounding ability, leading to incorrect predictions and drastic performance degradation. In Referring Expression Comprehension (REC), for instance, pruning causes the accuracy of LLaVA on the RefCOCO validation set to drop from 56.14% to 15.34%. Our analysis identifies misaligned position IDs after pruning as the primary cause of this degradation, as both the order and value of these IDs are crucial for maintaining performance in grounding tasks. To address this issue, we propose Grounding-Aware Token Pruning (GAP), a simple yet effective adjustment to position IDs that recovers REC accuracy back to 51.42%, which is 90% of the original performance in the without pruning setting, all while requiring no additional training, memory, or computational overhead. Applied to models such as Shikra, MiniGPTv2, and the LLaVA series, our method consistently improves performance across various token pruning strategies.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 25 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2025.

Builds on

25 of 31 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024SparseVLM: Visual Token Sparsification for Efficient Vision-Language Model Inference6 Oct
  2. 2024Recoverable Compression: A Multimodal Vision Token Recovery Mechanism Guided by Text Information2 Sep
  3. 2024LLaVA-PruMerge: Adaptive Token Reduction for Efficient Large Multimodal Models22 Mar
  4. 2023PuMer: Pruning and Merging Tokens for Efficient Vision Language Models27 May
  5. 2023SmartTrim: Adaptive Tokens and Attention Pruning for Efficient Vision-Language Models24 May

Other references · 20

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  4. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  5. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
  6. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
  7. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,719
  8. 2023MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Modelscited by 2,711
  9. 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,652
  10. 2023MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilitiescited by 1,239
  11. 2019OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledgecited by 1,121
  12. 2023Shikra: Unleashing Multimodal LLM's Referential Dialogue Magiccited by 906
8 more
  1. 2018VizWiz Grand Challenge: Answering Visual Questions from Blind Peoplecited by 858
  2. 2021MDETR -- Modulated Detection for End-to-End Multi-Modal Understandingcited by 819
  3. 2023CogVLM: Visual Expert for Pretrained Language Modelscited by 708
  4. 2022EVA: Exploring the Limits of Masked Visual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 691
  5. 2023MiniGPT-v2: large language model as a unified interface for vision-language multi-task learningcited by 625
  6. 2023Ferret: Refer and Ground Anything Anywhere at Any Granularitycited by 509
  7. 2021Chasing Sparsity in Vision Transformers: An End-to-End Explorationcited by 183
  8. 2020Referring Expression Comprehension: A Survey of Methods and Datasetscited by 79

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 8.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026TwinPrune: Density-Aware Two-Phase Token Pruning for Vision-Language Models
  2. 2025Balanced Token Pruning: Accelerating Vision Language Models Beyond Local Optimization
  3. 2026CLIP Tricks You: Training-free Token Pruning for Efficient Pixel Grounding in Large VIsion-Language Models
  4. 2024Feather the Throttle: Revisiting Visual Token Pruning for Vision-Language Model Acceleration
  5. 2025A Glimpse to Compress: Dynamic Visual Token Pruning for Large Vision-Language Models
  6. 2026Beyond One-Size-Fits-All: Sample-Adaptive Strategy Routing for Vision Token Pruning in MLLMs
  7. 2025When Token Pruning is Worse than Random: Understanding Visual Token Information in VLLMs
  8. 2026Centering before Pruning: Lightweight Geometry Correction for Diversity-Based Visual Token Pruning in LVLMs