Adversarial Threats in Quantum Machine Learning: A Survey of Attacks and Defenses
On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) integrates quantum computing with classical machine learning, primarily to solve classification, regression and generative tasks. However, its rapid development raises critical security challenges in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era. This chapter examines adversarial threats unique to QML systems, focusing on vulnerabilities in cloud-based deployments, hybrid architectures, and quantum generative models. Key attack vectors include model stealing via transpilation or output extraction, data poisoning through quantum-specific perturbations, reverse engineering of proprietary variational quantum circuits, and backdoor attacks. Adversaries exploit noise-prone quantum hardware and insufficiently secured QML-as-a-Service (QMLaaS) workflows to compromise model integrity, ownership, and functionality. Defense mechanisms leverage quantum properties to counter these threats. Noise signatures from training hardware act as non-invasive watermarks, while hardware-aware obfuscation techniques and ensemble strategies disrupt cloning attempts. Emerging solutions also adapt classical adversarial training and differential privacy to quantum settings, addressing vulnerabilities in quantum neural networks and generative architectures. However, securing QML requires addressing open challenges such as balancing noise levels for reliability and security, mitigating cross-platform attacks, and developing quantum-classical trust frameworks. This chapter summarizes recent advances in attacks and defenses, offering a roadmap for researchers and practitioners to build robust, trustworthy QML systems resilient to evolving adversarial landscapes.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 16 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2025.
Builds on
16 of 26 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Adversarial Data Poisoning Attacks on Quantum Machine Learning in the NISQ Era21 Nov
- 2024The Quantum Imitation Game: Reverse Engineering of Quantum Machine Learning Models9 Jul
Other references · 14
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 665
- 2023Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Machine Learningcited by 203
- 2020Improved Adversarial Training via Learned Optimizercited by 22
- 2023QuMoS: A Framework for Preserving Security of Quantum Machine Learning Modelcited by 6
- 2024Evaluating Efficacy of Model Stealing Attacks and Defenses on Quantum Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2024Quantum Cloud Computing: A Review, Open Problems, and Future Directionscited by 6
- 2024Security Attacks Abusing Pulse-level Quantum Circuitscited by 6
- 2024AI-driven Reverse Engineering of QML Modelscited by 5
- 2025OPAQUE: Obfuscating Phase in Quantum Circuit Compilation for Efficient IP Protectioncited by 4
- 2025CopyQNN: Quantum Neural Network Extraction Attack under Varying Quantum Noisecited by 4
- 2025Unveiling and Mitigating Adversarial Vulnerabilities in Iterative Optimizerscited by 4
- 2024Guardians of the Quantum GANcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025SoK: Critical Evaluation of Quantum Machine Learning for Adversarial Robustness
- 2025Entangled Threats: A Unified Kill Chain Model for Quantum Machine Learning Security
- 2026Characterizing Privacy Risks of Quantum Machine Learning with Emergent Quantum-Native Access
- 2026Quantum-Enhanced Adversarial Robustness in Artificial Intelligence
- 2025A Primer on Quantum Machine Learning
- 2026Backdoor Threats in Variational Quantum Circuits: Taxonomy, Attacks, and Defenses ↗
- 2024Quantum Machine Learning Architecture Search via Deep Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Quantum vs. Classical Machine Learning: A Unified Empirical Comparison