mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Emergent Granger Causality in Neural Networks: Can Prediction Alone Reveal Structure?

arXiv 2506.20347 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Granger Causality (GC) offers an elegant statistical framework to study the association between multivariate time series data. Vector autoregressive models (VAR) are simple and easy to fit, but have limited application because of their inherent inability to capture more complex (e.g., non-linear) associations. Numerous attempts have already been made in the literature that exploit the functional approximation power of deep neural networks (DNNs) for GC. However, these methods treat GC as a variable selection problem. We present a novel paradigm for investigating the learned GC from a single neural network used for joint modeling of all components of multivariate time series data, which is essentially linked with prediction and assessing the distribution shift in residuals. A deep learning model, with proper regularization, may learn the true GC structure when jointly used for all components of the time series when there is sufficient training data. We propose to uncover the learned GC structure by comparing the model uncertainty or distribution of the residuals when the past of everything is used as compared to the one where a specific time series component is dropped from the model. We also compare the effect of input layer dropout on the ability of a neural network to learn GC. We show that a well-regularized model can learn the true GC structure from the data without explicitly adding terms in the loss function that guide the model to select variables or perform sparse regression under specific settings. We also provide a comparison of deep learning architectures such as CNN, LSTM and transformer models on their ability to discover Granger Causality. The numerical experiments demonstrate that, compared to sparse regression models, a simple joint model is a strong baseline for learning the true GC which has the advantage that it does not require tuning of many extra hyper-parameters.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2025.

Builds on

14 of 30 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  3. 2018Deep learning for time series classification: a reviewcited by 576
  4. 2020Interpretability of machine learning based prediction models in healthcarecited by 75
  5. 2021Granger Causality: A Review and Recent Advancescited by 63
  6. 2022A Survey on Masked Autoencoder for Self-supervised Learning in Vision and Beyondcited by 58
  7. 2019Economy Statistical Recurrent Units For Inferring Nonlinear Granger Causalitycited by 55
  8. 2024Recent Advances of Foundation Language Models-based Continual Learning: A Surveycited by 46
  9. 2021Interpretable Models for Granger Causality Using Self-explaining Neural Networkscited by 45
  10. 2023CUTS+: High-dimensional Causal Discovery from Irregular Time-seriescited by 41
  11. 2023CUTS: Neural Causal Discovery from Irregular Time-Series Datacited by 33
  12. 2022Deep Recurrent Modelling of Granger Causality with Latent Confoundingcited by 8
2 more
  1. 2021Spectral Dependencecited by 6
  2. 2023Measuring Information Transfer Between Nodes in a Brain Network through Spectral Transfer Entropycited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.