Assessing Risk of Stealing Proprietary Models for Medical Imaging Tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The success of deep learning in medical imaging applications has led several companies to deploy proprietary models in diagnostic workflows, offering monetized services. Even though model weights are hidden to protect the intellectual property of the service provider, these models are exposed to model stealing (MS) attacks, where adversaries can clone the model's functionality by querying it with a proxy dataset and training a thief model on the acquired predictions. While extensively studied on general vision tasks, the susceptibility of medical imaging models to MS attacks remains inadequately explored. This paper investigates the vulnerability of black-box medical imaging models to MS attacks under realistic conditions where the adversary lacks access to the victim model's training data and operates with limited query budgets. We demonstrate that adversaries can effectively execute MS attacks by using publicly available datasets. To further enhance MS capabilities with limited query budgets, we propose a two-step model stealing approach termed QueryWise. This method capitalizes on unlabeled data obtained from a proxy distribution to train the thief model without incurring additional queries. Evaluation on two medical imaging models for Gallbladder Cancer and COVID-19 classification substantiates the effectiveness of the proposed attack. The source code is available at https://github.com/rajankita/QueryWise.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2025.
Builds on
26 of 33 references.
References · 26
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
- 2020Long-tail learning via logit adjustmentcited by 618
- 2018Born Again Neural Networkscited by 546
- 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 292
- 2019High Accuracy and High Fidelity Extraction of Neural Networkscited by 214
14 more
- 2017Towards Poisoning of Deep Learning Algorithms with Back-gradient Optimizationcited by 197
- 2020Adversarial Machine Learning -- Industry Perspectivescited by 122
- 2019Prediction Poisoning: Towards Defenses Against DNN Model Stealing Attackscited by 81
- 2019Defending Against Model Stealing Attacks with Adaptive Misinformationcited by 57
- 2021Black-Box Dissector: Towards Erasing-based Hard-Label Model Stealing Attackcited by 25
- 2022How to Steer Your Adversary: Targeted and Efficient Model Stealing Defenses with Gradient Redirectioncited by 21
- 2021COVIDx-US -- An open-access benchmark dataset of ultrasound imaging data for AI-driven COVID-19 analyticscited by 17
- 2023Dual Student Networks for Data-Free Model Stealingcited by 17
- 2022Surpassing the Human Accuracy: Detecting Gallbladder Cancer from USG Images with Curriculum Learningcited by 16
- 2021Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Deep Diagnostic Models by Adversarial Attackcited by 15
- 2022Unsupervised Contrastive Learning of Image Representations from Ultrasound Videos with Hard Negative Miningcited by 14
- 2022RadFormer: Transformers with Global-Local Attention for Interpretable and Accurate Gallbladder Cancer Detectioncited by 12
- 2022Suppressing Poisoning Attacks on Federated Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 8
- 2022Adversarially Robust Prototypical Few-shot Segmentation with Neural-ODEscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.