mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Leveraging neural network interatomic potentials for a foundation model of chemistry

arXiv 2506.18497 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2025cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large-scale foundation models, including neural network interatomic potentials (NIPs) in computational materials science, have demonstrated significant potential. However, despite their success in accelerating atomistic simulations, NIPs face challenges in directly predicting electronic properties and often require coupling to higher-scale models or extensive simulations for macroscopic properties. Machine learning (ML) offers alternatives for structure-to-property mapping but faces trade-offs: feature-based methods often lack generalizability, while deep neural networks require significant data and computational power. To address these trade-offs, we introduce HackNIP, a two-stage pipeline that leverages pretrained NIPs. This method first extracts fixed-length feature vectors (embeddings) from NIP foundation models and then uses these embeddings to train shallow ML models for downstream structure-to-property predictions. This study investigates whether such a hybridization approach, by ``hacking" the NIP, can outperform end-to-end deep neural networks, determines the dataset size at which this transfer learning approach surpasses direct fine-tuning of the NIP, and identifies which NIP embedding depths yield the most informative features. HackNIP is benchmarked on Matbench, evaluated for data efficiency, and tested on diverse tasks including textitab initio, experimental, and molecular properties. We also analyze how embedding depth impacts performance. This work demonstrates a hybridization strategy to overcome ML trade-offs in materials science, aiming to democratize high-performance predictive modeling.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2025.

Builds on

20 of 51 references.

References · 20

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  5. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
  6. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  7. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  8. 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,208
  9. 2017MoleculeNet: A Benchmark for Molecular Machine Learningcited by 1,051
  10. 2021E(n) Equivariant Graph Neural Networkscited by 965
  11. 2021E(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Data-Efficient and Accurate Interatomic Potentialscited by 708
  12. 2022MACE: Higher Order Equivariant Message Passing Neural Networks for Fast and Accurate Force Fieldscited by 474
8 more
  1. 2021ChemRL-GEM: Geometry Enhanced Molecular Representation Learning for Property Predictioncited by 204
  2. 2023EquiformerV2: Improved Equivariant Transformer for Scaling to Higher-Degree Representationscited by 204
  3. 2022ChemBERTa-2: Towards Chemical Foundation Modelscited by 127
  4. 2024Orb: A Fast, Scalable Neural Network Potentialcited by 66
  5. 2022Crystal Twins: Self-supervised Learning for Crystalline Material Property Predictioncited by 34
  6. 2017Machine learning modeling of superconducting critical temperaturecited by 32
  7. 2022Graph Contrastive Learning for Materialscited by 7
  8. 2024Scaling Law of Sim2Real Transfer Learning in Expanding Computational Materials Databases for Real-World Predictionscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.