Tight simulation of a distribution using conditional samples
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present an algorithm for simulating a distribution using prefix conditional samples (Adar, Fischer and Levi, 2024), as well as ``prefix-compatible'' conditional models such as the interval model (Cannone, Ron and Servedio, 2015) and the subcube model (CRS15, Bhattacharyya and Chakraborty, 2018). The sample complexity is O(log2 N / varepsilon2) prefix conditional samples per query, which improves on the previously known tildeO(log3 N / varepsilon2) (Kumar, Meel and Pote, 2025). Moreover, our simulating distribution is O(varepsilon2)-close to the input distribution with respect to the Kullback-Leibler divergence, which is stricter than the usual guarantee of being O(varepsilon)-close with respect to the total-variation distance. We show that our algorithm is tight with respect to the highly-related task of estimation: every algorithm that is able to estimate the mass of individual elements within (1 ± varepsilon)-multiplicative error must make Omega(log2 N / varepsilon2) prefix conditional samples per element.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Total Variation Distance Estimation in Autoregressive Models21 Jul 2026