mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Weighted Assumption Based Argumentation to reason about ethical principles and actions

arXiv 2506.18056 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2025cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We augment Assumption Based Argumentation (ABA for short) with weighted argumentation. In a nutshell, we assign weights to arguments and then derive the weight of attacks between ABA arguments. We illustrate our proposal through running examples in the field of ethical reasoning, and present an implementation based on Answer Set Programming.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2025.

Builds on

4 of 34 references.

References · 4

  1. 2017Multi-shot ASP solving with clingocited by 115
  2. 2017A Voting-Based System for Ethical Decision Makingcited by 55
  3. 2016ABA+: Assumption-Based Argumentation with Preferencescited by 9
  4. 2018The Jiminy Advisor: Moral Agreements Among Stakeholders Based on Norms and Argumentationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

  1. 2026Fuzzy Representation of Normscited by 0