mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Leveraging Influence Functions for Resampling Data in Physics-Informed Neural Networks

arXiv 2506.16443 ↗First posted 19 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AI physics.comp-phcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) offer a powerful approach to solving partial differential equations (PDEs), which are ubiquitous in the quantitative sciences. Applied to both forward and inverse problems across various scientific domains, PINNs have recently emerged as a valuable tool in the field of scientific machine learning. A key aspect of their training is that the data -- spatio-temporal points sampled from the PDE's input domain -- are readily available. Influence functions, a tool from the field of explainable AI (XAI), approximate the effect of individual training points on the model, enhancing interpretability. In the present work, we explore the application of influence function-based sampling approaches for the training data. Our results indicate that such targeted resampling based on data attribution methods has the potential to enhance prediction accuracy in physics-informed neural networks, demonstrating a practical application of an XAI method in PINN training.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2025.

Builds on

25 of 38 references.

References · 25

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  3. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
  4. 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 619
  5. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
  6. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 547
  7. 2021Physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for inverse designcited by 280
  8. 2022A comprehensive study of non-adaptive and residual-based adaptive sampling for physics-informed neural networkscited by 236
  9. 2020Understanding and mitigating gradient pathologies in physics-informed neural networkscited by 135
  10. 2022Training Data Influence Analysis and Estimation: A Surveycited by 135
  11. 2021Scaling Up Influence Functionscited by 132
  12. 2023An Expert's Guide to Training Physics-informed Neural Networkscited by 126
13 more
  1. 2024Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 113
  2. 2021Efficient training of physics-informed neural networks via importance samplingcited by 110
  3. 2022Physics-Informed Machine Learning: A Survey on Problems, Methods and Applicationscited by 92
  4. 2021Input Similarity from the Neural Network Perspectivecited by 79
  5. 2022Mitigating Propagation Failures in Physics-informed Neural Networks using Retain-Resample-Release (R3) Samplingcited by 73
  6. 2024ConFIG: Towards Conflict-free Training of Physics Informed Neural Networkscited by 46
  7. 2024PINNACLE: PINN Adaptive ColLocation and Experimental points selectioncited by 32
  8. 2023An operator preconditioning perspective on training in physics-informed machine learningcited by 27
  9. 2022On the Role of Fixed Points of Dynamical Systems in Training Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 23
  10. 2022Physics-informed neural networks for solving parametric magnetostatic problemscited by 10
  11. 2025ProPINN: Demystifying Propagation Failures in Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 6
  12. 2024Final-Model-Only Data Attribution with a Unifying View of Gradient-Based Methodscited by 5
  13. 2024Investigating Guiding Information for Adaptive Collocation Point Sampling in PINNscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.