mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Mechanisms to Verify International Agreements About AI Development

arXiv 2506.15867 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2025cs.CYcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

International agreements about AI development may be required to reduce catastrophic risks from advanced AI systems. However, agreements about such a high-stakes technology must be backed by verification mechanisms--processes or tools that give one party greater confidence that another is following the agreed-upon rules, typically by detecting violations. This report gives an overview of potential verification approaches for three example policy goals, aiming to demonstrate how countries could practically verify claims about each other's AI development and deployment. The focus is on international agreements and state-involved AI development, but these approaches could also be applied to domestic regulation of companies. While many of the ideal solutions for verification are not yet technologically feasible, we emphasize that increased access (e.g., physical inspections of data centers) can often substitute for these technical approaches. Therefore, we remain hopeful that significant political will could enable ambitious international coordination, with strong verification mechanisms, to reduce catastrophic AI risks.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

9 papers.