mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Federated Learning for MRI-based BrainAGE: a multicenter study on post-stroke functional outcome prediction

arXiv 2506.15626 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.DCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Objective: Brain-predicted age difference (BrainAGE) is a neuroimaging biomarker reflecting brain health. However, training robust BrainAGE models requires large datasets, often restricted by privacy concerns. This study evaluates the performance of federated learning (FL) for BrainAGE estimation in ischemic stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy, and investigates its association with clinical phenotypes and functional outcomes. Methods: We used FLAIR brain images from 1674 stroke patients across 16 hospital centers. We implemented standard machine learning and deep learning models for BrainAGE estimates under three data management strategies: centralized learning (pooled data), FL (local training at each site), and single-site learning. We reported prediction errors and examined associations between BrainAGE and vascular risk factors (e.g., diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking), as well as functional outcomes at three months post-stroke. Logistic regression evaluated BrainAGE's predictive value for these outcomes, adjusting for age, sex, vascular risk factors, stroke severity, time between MRI and arterial puncture, prior intravenous thrombolysis, and recanalisation outcome. Results: While centralized learning yielded the most accurate predictions, FL consistently outperformed single-site models. BrainAGE was significantly higher in patients with diabetes mellitus across all models. Comparisons between patients with good and poor functional outcomes, and multivariate predictions of these outcomes showed the significance of the association between BrainAGE and post-stroke recovery. Conclusion: FL enables accurate age predictions without data centralization. The strong association between BrainAGE, vascular risk factors, and post-stroke recovery highlights its potential for prognostic modeling in stroke care.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2025.

Builds on

15 of 56 references.

References · 15

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  3. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  4. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  5. 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,156
  6. 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 906
  7. 2020The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learningcited by 633
  8. 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental Studycited by 568
  9. 2021SynthSeg: Segmentation of brain MRI scans of any contrast and resolution without retrainingcited by 237
  10. 2019Automated brain extraction of multi-sequence MRI using artificial neural networkscited by 134
  11. 2016Predicting brain age with deep learning from raw imaging data results in a reliable and heritable biomarkercited by 72
  12. 2021Secure Neuroimaging Analysis using Federated Learning with Homomorphic Encryptioncited by 18
3 more
  1. 2021Scaling Neuroscience Research using Federated Learningcited by 10
  2. 2023Experimenting with Normalization Layers in Federated Learning on non-IID scenarioscited by 8
  3. 2022Towards Sparsified Federated Neuroimaging Models via Weight Pruningcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.