mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Intelligent Assistants for the Semiconductor Failure Analysis with LLM-Based Planning Agents

arXiv 2506.15567 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2025cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Failure Analysis (FA) is a highly intricate and knowledge-intensive process. The integration of AI components within the computational infrastructure of FA labs has the potential to automate a variety of tasks, including the detection of non-conformities in images, the retrieval of analogous cases from diverse data sources, and the generation of reports from annotated images. However, as the number of deployed AI models increases, the challenge lies in orchestrating these components into cohesive and efficient workflows that seamlessly integrate with the FA process. This paper investigates the design and implementation of an agentic AI system for semiconductor FA using a Large Language Model (LLM)-based Planning Agent (LPA). The LPA integrates LLMs with advanced planning capabilities and external tool utilization, allowing autonomous processing of complex queries, retrieval of relevant data from external systems, and generation of human-readable responses. The evaluation results demonstrate the agent's operational effectiveness and reliability in supporting FA tasks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 20 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2025.

Builds on

20 of 48 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  5. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  6. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  7. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  8. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  9. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  10. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  11. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  12. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
8 more
  1. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  2. 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,785
  3. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
  4. 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,173
  5. 2023Augmented Language Models: a Surveycited by 398
  6. 2024The Impact of Reasoning Step Length on Large Language Modelscited by 152
  7. 2023An In-depth Survey of Large Language Model-based Artificial Intelligence Agentscited by 30
  8. 2024SemiKong: Curating, Training, and Evaluating A Semiconductor Industry-Specific Large Language Modelcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026SemiFA: An Agentic Multi-Modal Framework for Autonomous Semiconductor Failure Analysis Report Generation
  2. 2026AgentFixer: From Failure Detection to Fix Recommendations in LLM Agentic Systems
  3. 2026COOPA: A Modular LLM Agent Architecture for Operations Research Problems
  4. 2024Testing and Understanding Erroneous Planning in LLM Agents through Synthesized User Inputs
  5. 2026Who Broke the System? Failure Localization in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems
  6. 2025Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failures
  7. 2025Failure Modes in LLM Systems: A System-Level Taxonomy for Reliable AI Applications
  8. 2025Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? On Automated Failure Attribution of LLM Multi-Agent Systems