mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

StaQ: a Finite Memory Approach to Discrete Action Policy Mirror Descent

arXiv 2506.13862 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity

Abstract (arXiv)

In Reinforcement Learning (RL), regularization with a Kullback-Leibler divergence that penalizes large deviations between successive policies has emerged as a popular tool both in theory and practice. This family of algorithms, often referred to as Policy Mirror Descent (PMD), has the property of averaging out policy evaluation errors which are bound to occur when using function approximators. However, exact PMD has remained a mostly theoretical framework, as its closed-form solution involves the sum of all past Q-functions which is generally intractable. A common practical approximation of PMD is to follow the natural policy gradient or use actor-critic approaches, but this potentially introduces errors in the policy update. In this paper, we propose and analyze PMD-like algorithms for discrete action spaces that only keep the last M Q-functions in memory. We show theoretically that for a finite and large enough M, an RL algorithm can be derived that introduces no errors from the policy update, yet keeps the desirable PMD property of averaging out policy evaluation errors. Using an efficient GPU implementation, we then show empirically on medium-scale RL benchmarks such as MinAtar that increasing M improves performance up to a certain threshold after which the performance becomes close to that of exact PMD, reinforcing the theoretical findings that using an infinite sum might be unnecessary and that keeping in memory the last M Q-functions is a practical and theoretically grounded implementation of PMD.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025On the Effect of Regularization in Policy Mirror Descent
  2. 2026Approximation of Log-Partition Function in Policy Mirror Descent Induces Implicit Regularization for LLM Post-Training
  3. 2025Policy Mirror Descent with Temporal Difference Learning: Sample Complexity under Online Markov Data
  4. 2025On the Convergence of Policy Mirror Descent with Temporal Difference Evaluation
  5. 2024Operator World Models for Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2026Beyond State-Wise Mirror Descent: Offline Policy Optimization with Parametric Policies
  7. 2024Policy Mirror Descent with Lookahead
  8. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Discrete Diffusion Policies for Combinatorial Action Spaces