mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MLDebugging: Towards Benchmarking Code Debugging Across Multi-Library Scenarios

arXiv 2506.13824 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2025cs.SE cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Code debugging is a crucial task in software engineering, which attracts increasing attention. While remarkable success has been made in the era of large language models (LLMs), current research still focuses on the simple no-library or single-library setting, ignoring the complex multi-library scenario in real-world applications. To address this limitation, we make the first attempt to introduce MLDebugging (Multi-Library Debugging), a comprehensive benchmark designed to assess debugging challenges within multi-library Python code. Specifically, MLDebugging encompasses 126 distinct Python libraries, covering a wide range of multi-library code issues, categorized into seven distinct types. Furthermore, we conduct a thorough evaluation of MLDebugging using both mainstream open-source and closed-source LLMs and highlight that current LLMs still struggle to correctly perform code debugging across multi-library scenarios. We hope this work can uncover the potential of LLMs in multi-library debugging scenario and offer insights for future research.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2025.

Builds on

18 of 41 references.

References · 18

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  2. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  3. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
  4. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
  5. 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,203
  6. 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 546
  7. 2024Debug like a Human: A Large Language Model Debugger via Verifying Runtime Execution Step-by-stepcited by 127
  8. 2024Large Language Models Meet NLP: A Surveycited by 103
  9. 2023Cross-lingual Prompting: Improving Zero-shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning across Languagescited by 97
  10. 2024DebugBench: Evaluating Debugging Capability of Large Language Modelscited by 76
  11. 2024Unlocking the Capabilities of Thought: A Reasoning Boundary Framework to Quantify and Optimize Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 56
  12. 2023xCodeEval: A Large Scale Multilingual Multitask Benchmark for Code Understanding, Generation, Translation and Retrievalcited by 47
6 more
  1. 2024From Code to Correctness: Closing the Last Mile of Code Generation with Hierarchical Debuggingcited by 46
  2. 2024Drawing Pandas: A Benchmark for LLMs in Generating Plotting Codecited by 23
  3. 2024ExecRepoBench: Multi-level Executable Code Completion Evaluationcited by 20
  4. 2024AutoCAP: Towards Automatic Cross-lingual Alignment Planning for Zero-shot Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 19
  5. 2024ComplexCodeEval: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Code Models on More Complex Codecited by 19
  6. 2025GraphMaster: Automated Graph Synthesis via LLM Agents in Data-Limited Environmentscited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.