mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

In Silico Study for Optimizing Intensity and Focality Electrode Configurations for Directional DBS Under Uncertainty Using Metaheuristic L1L1 Method

arXiv 2506.13452 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2025math.OC cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Background and Objective: As Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) advances toward directional leads and optimization-based current steering, selecting electrode contact configurations becomes complex. This study formulates configuration selection as an inverse mapping between target activation and electrode currents using metaheuristic L1-norm regularized L1-norm fitting (L1L1). L1L1 incorporates lead-field uncertainty arising from electrode placement, tissue properties, and forward modeling assumptions. Methods: The framework introduces lead-field perturbations and restricts the controllable domain through a sensitivity-based feasibility criterion within a finite element formulation derived using the Complete Electrode Model. Current distributions were optimized for 8- and 40-contact leads. Performance was evaluated using focused current density, nuisance current density, and their ratio under safety and sparsity constraints. Results: L1L1 was evaluated using noiseless and noisy lead fields, with noise selected to reflect attenuation within the volume of tissue activated. The method produced sparse, spatially selective stimulation patterns across perturbation levels. Hyperparameter optimization yielded bipolar or multipolar configurations. Compared with the Reciprocity Principle (RP), which produced strictly bipolar configurations, and Tikhonov-regularized least squares (TLS), which produced more distributed solutions, L1L1 enabled controlled transitions between sparse and multipolar patterns. It concentrated stimulation within the target while limiting unintended current spread, particularly under noisy conditions. Conclusions: L1L1 can assist specialists in optimizing DBS configurations. By incorporating uncertainty directly into optimization, it provides robust and interpretable current steering across lead configurations while accounting for forward-model variability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2025.

Builds on

4 of 62 references.

References · 4

  1. 2015An optimization approach for well-targeted transcranial direct current stimulationcited by 1
  2. 2017Uncertainty Quantification of Oscillation Suppression during DBS in a Coupled Finite Element and Network Modelcited by 1
  3. 2018Zeffiro user interface for electromagnetic brain imaging: a GPU accelerated FEM tool for forward and inverse computations in Matlabcited by 1
  4. 2022L1-norm vs. L2-norm fitting in optimizing focal multi-channel tES stimulation: linear and semidefinite programming vs. weighted least squarescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.