Navigating the Black Box: Leveraging LLMs for Effective Text-Level Graph Injection Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Text-attributed graphs (TAGs) integrate textual data with graph structures, providing valuable insights in applications such as social network analysis and recommendation systems. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) effectively capture both topological structure and textual information in TAGs but are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Existing graph injection attack (GIA) methods assume that attackers can directly manipulate the embedding layer, producing non-explainable node embeddings. Furthermore, the effectiveness of these attacks often relies on surrogate models with high training costs. Thus, this paper introduces ATAG-LLM, a novel black-box GIA framework tailored for TAGs. Our approach leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate interpretable text-level node attributes directly, ensuring attacks remain feasible in real-world scenarios. We design strategies for LLM prompting that balance exploration and reliability to guide text generation, and propose a similarity assessment method to evaluate attack text effectiveness in disrupting graph homophily. This method efficiently perturbs the target node with minimal training costs in a strict black-box setting, ensuring a text-level graph injection attack for TAGs. Experiments on real-world TAG datasets validate the superior performance of ATAG-LLM compared to state-of-the-art embedding-level and text-level attack methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2025.
Builds on
24 of 28 references.
References · 24
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 737
- 2018Adversarial Attacks on Neural Networks for Graph Datacited by 397
- 2018TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applicationscited by 381
- 2018Adversarial Attack on Graph Structured Datacited by 301
- 2018Adversarial Attack and Defense on Graph Data: A Surveycited by 167
- 2022Learning on Large-scale Text-attributed Graphs via Variational Inferencecited by 155
- 2018Adversarial Attacks on Node Embeddings via Graph Poisoningcited by 109
- 2023A Survey of Graph Meets Large Language Model: Progress and Future Directionscited by 85
- 2021TDGIA:Effective Injection Attacks on Graph Neural Networkscited by 67
- 2022Understanding and Improving Graph Injection Attack by Promoting Unnoticeabilitycited by 62
- 2020Scalable Attack on Graph Data by Injecting Vicious Nodescited by 50
12 more
- 2021Single Node Injection Attack against Graph Neural Networkscited by 45
- 2022Efficiently Leveraging Multi-level User Intent for Session-based Recommendation via Atten-Mixer Networkcited by 38
- 2024GraphEdit: Large Language Models for Graph Structure Learningcited by 33
- 2024Can Large Language Models Improve the Adversarial Robustness of Graph Neural Networks?cited by 23
- 2021How does Heterophily Impact the Robustness of Graph Neural Networks? Theoretical Connections and Practical Implicationscited by 21
- 2022Let Graph be the Go Board: Gradient-free Node Injection Attack for Graph Neural Networks via Reinforcement Learningcited by 19
- 2021PETGEN: Personalized Text Generation Attack on Deep Sequence Embedding-based Classification Modelscited by 17
- 2019Node Injection Attacks on Graphs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
- 2022Adversarial Camouflage for Node Injection Attack on Graphscited by 11
- 2024Learning on Graphs with Large Language Models(LLMs): A Deep Dive into Model Robustnesscited by 11
- 2024Intruding with Words: Towards Understanding Graph Injection Attacks at the Text Levelcited by 9
- 2021An Adaptive Graph Pre-training Framework for Localized Collaborative Filteringcited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.