Development of the user-friendly decision aid Rule-based Evaluation and Support Tool (REST) for optimizing the resources of an information extraction task
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Rules could be an information extraction (IE) default option, compared to ML and LLMs in terms of sustainability, transferability, interpretability, and development burden. We suggest a sustainable and combined use of rules and ML as an IE method. Our approach starts with an exhaustive expert manual highlighting in a single working session of a representative subset of the data corpus. We developed and validated the feasibility and the performance metrics of the REST decision tool to help the annotator choose between rules as a by default option and ML for each entity of an IE task. REST makes the annotator visualize the characteristics of each entity formalization in the free texts and the expected rule development feasibility and IE performance metrics. ML is considered as a backup IE option and manual annotation for training is therefore minimized. The external validity of REST on a 12-entity use case showed good reproducibility.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2025.
Builds on
3 of 15 references.
References · 3
- 2023A Zero-shot and Few-shot Study of Instruction-Finetuned Large Language Models Applied to Clinical and Biomedical Taskscited by 25
- 2023Evaluation of ChatGPT on Biomedical Tasks: A Zero-Shot Comparison with Fine-Tuned Generative Transformerscited by 22
- 2019Named Entity Recognition for Electronic Health Records: A Comparison of Rule-based and Machine Learning Approachescited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.