mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dynamic Reinsurance Treaty Bidding via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2506.13113 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2025cs.AI econ.GN q-fin.ECcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper develops a novel multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) framework for reinsurance treaty bidding, addressing long-standing inefficiencies in traditional broker-mediated placement processes. We pose the core research question: Can autonomous, learning-based bidding systems improve risk transfer efficiency and outperform conventional pricing approaches in reinsurance markets? In our model, each reinsurer is represented by an adaptive agent that iteratively refines its bidding strategy within a competitive, partially observable environment. The simulation explicitly incorporates institutional frictions including broker intermediation, incumbent advantages, last-look privileges, and asymmetric access to underwriting information. Empirical analysis demonstrates that MARL agents achieve up to 15% higher underwriting profit, 20% lower tail risk (CVaR), and over 25% improvement in Sharpe ratios relative to actuarial and heuristic baselines. Sensitivity tests confirm robustness across hyperparameter settings, and stress testing reveals strong resilience under simulated catastrophe shocks and capital constraints. These findings suggest that MARL offers a viable path toward more transparent, adaptive, and risk-sensitive reinsurance markets. The proposed framework contributes to emerging literature at the intersection of algorithmic market design, strategic bidding, and AI-enabled financial decision-making.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2025.

Builds on

20 of 84 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  4. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  5. 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,070
  6. 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
  7. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
  8. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 727
  9. 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 561
  10. 2019Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithmscited by 555
  11. 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
  12. 2018Mean Field Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 202
8 more
  1. 2015Risk-Sensitive and Robust Decision-Making: a CVaR Optimization Approachcited by 162
  2. 2017A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for the Financial Portfolio Management Problemcited by 123
  3. 2018Deep Hedgingcited by 106
  4. 2016Opponent Modeling in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 94
  5. 2017A Survey of Learning in Multiagent Environments: Dealing with Non-Stationaritycited by 93
  6. 2018Market Making via Reinforcement Learningcited by 45
  7. 2017Learning to Bid Without Knowing your Valuecited by 34
  8. 2019Learning to bid in revenue-maximizing auctionscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.