Humans, Machine Learning, and Language Models in Union: A Cognitive Study on Table Unionability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data discovery and table unionability in particular became key tasks in modern Data Science. However, the human perspective for these tasks is still under-explored. Thus, this research investigates the human behavior in determining table unionability within data discovery. We have designed an experimental survey and conducted a comprehensive analysis, in which we assess human decision-making for table unionability. We use the observations from the analysis to develop a machine learning framework to boost the (raw) performance of humans. Furthermore, we perform a preliminary study on how LLM performance is compared to humans indicating that it is typically better to consider a combination of both. We believe that this work lays the foundations for developing future Human-in-the-Loop systems for efficient data discovery.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2025.
Builds on
8 of 26 references.
References · 8
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Prompting GPT-3 To Be Reliablecited by 260
- 2022Semantics-aware Dataset Discovery from Data Lakes with Contextualized Column-based Representation Learningcited by 38
- 2022SANTOS: Relationship-based Semantic Table Union Searchcited by 32
- 2018Reducing Uncertainty of Schema Matching via Crowdsourcing with Accuracy Ratescited by 6
- 2020Learning to Characterize Matching Expertscited by 5
- 2021PoWareMatch: a Quality-aware Deep Learning Approach to Improve Human Schema Matchingcited by 4
- 2022HumanAL: Calibrating Human Matching Beyond a Single Taskcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.