mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Uncovering Social Network Activity Using Joint User and Topic Interaction

arXiv 2506.12842 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2025cs.SI cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The emergence of online social platforms, such as social networks and social media, has drastically affected the way people apprehend the information flows to which they are exposed. In such platforms, various information cascades spreading among users is the main force creating complex dynamics of opinion formation, each user being characterized by their own behavior adoption mechanism. Moreover, the spread of multiple pieces of information or beliefs in a networked population is rarely uncorrelated. In this paper, we introduce the Mixture of Interacting Cascades (MIC), a model of marked multidimensional Hawkes processes with the capacity to model jointly non-trivial interaction between cascades and users. We emphasize on the interplay between information cascades and user activity, and use a mixture of temporal point processes to build a coupled user/cascade point process model. Experiments on synthetic and real data highlight the benefits of this approach and demonstrate that MIC achieves superior performance to existing methods in modeling the spread of information cascades. Finally, we demonstrate how MIC can provide, through its learned parameters, insightful bi-layered visualizations of real social network activity data.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2025.

Builds on

29 of 74 references.

References · 29

  1. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  2. 2021Transformer Embeddings of Irregularly Spaced Events and Their Participantscited by 93
  3. 2016Learning Granger Causality for Hawkes Processescited by 69
  4. 2023EasyTPP: Towards Open Benchmarking Temporal Point Processescited by 68
  5. 2015COEVOLVE: A Joint Point Process Model for Information Diffusion and Network Co-evolutioncited by 37
  6. 2014Discovering Latent Network Structure in Point Process Datacited by 28
  7. 2014Exploiting Social Network Structure for Person-to-Person Sentiment Analysiscited by 26
  8. 2020A Survey of Information Cascade Analysis: Models, Predictions, and Recent Advancescited by 26
  9. 2015Learning and Forecasting Opinion Dynamics in Social Networkscited by 21
  10. 2018Efficient Non-parametric Bayesian Hawkes Processescited by 15
  11. 2019Learning Hawkes Processes from a Handful of Eventscited by 14
  12. 2016The Neural Hawkes Process: A Neurally Self-Modulating Multivariate Point Processcited by 13
17 more
  1. 2023Unmasking the Web of Deceit: Uncovering Coordinated Activity to Expose Information Operations on Twittercited by 13
  2. 2019Spatial-Temporal-Textual Point Processes for Crime Linkage Detectioncited by 12
  3. 2013Origins of power-law degree distribution in the heterogeneity of human activity in social networkscited by 9
  4. 2013The Simple Rules of Social Contagioncited by 9
  5. 2020Emergence of polarized ideological opinions in multidimensional topic spacescited by 9
  6. 2017Recurrent Poisson Factorization for Temporal Recommendationcited by 8
  7. 2016Multivariate Hawkes Processes for Large-scale Inferencecited by 6
  8. 2021Universality, criticality and complexity of information propagation in social mediacited by 6
  9. 2014MuxViz: A Tool for Multilayer Analysis and Visualization of Networkscited by 4
  10. 2015Correlated Cascades: Compete or Cooperatecited by 4
  11. 2014The Bursty Dynamics of the Twitter Information Networkcited by 2
  12. 2022Flexible Triggering Kernels for Hawkes Process Modelingcited by 2
  13. 2022DeGroot-based opinion formation under a global steering mechanismcited by 2
  14. 2024Conjugate Bayesian Two-step Change Point Detection for Hawkes Processcited by 2
  15. 2019Smart Information Spreading for Opinion Maximization in Social Networkscited by 1
  16. 2022Multivariate Powered Dirichlet Hawkes Processcited by 1
  17. 2025Voter model can accurately predict individual opinions in online populationscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.