Towards Building General Purpose Embedding Models for Industry 4.0 Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work we focus on improving language models' understanding for asset maintenance to guide the engineer's decisions and minimize asset downtime. Given a set of tasks expressed in natural language for Industry 4.0 domain, each associated with queries related to a specific asset, we want to recommend relevant items and generalize to queries of similar assets. A task may involve identifying relevant sensors given a query about an asset's failure mode. Our approach begins with gathering a qualitative, expert-vetted knowledge base to construct nine asset-specific task datasets. To create more contextually informed embeddings, we augment the input tasks using Large Language Models (LLMs), providing concise descriptions of the entities involved in the queries. This embedding model is then integrated with a Reasoning and Acting agent (ReAct), which serves as a powerful tool for answering complex user queries that require multi-step reasoning, planning, and knowledge inference. Through ablation studies, we demonstrate that: (a) LLM query augmentation improves the quality of embeddings, (b) Contrastive loss and other methods that avoid in-batch negatives are superior for datasets with queries related to many items, and (c) It is crucial to balance positive and negative in-batch samples. After training and testing on our dataset, we observe a substantial improvement: HIT@1 increases by +54.2%, MAP@100 by +50.1%, and NDCG@10 by +54.7%, averaged across all tasks and models. Additionally, we empirically demonstrate the model's planning and tool invocation capabilities when answering complex questions related to industrial asset maintenance, showcasing its effectiveness in supporting Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) in their day-to-day operations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2025.
Builds on
9 of 17 references.
References · 9
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 973
- 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 705
- 2023Chat-REC: Towards Interactive and Explainable LLMs-Augmented Recommender Systemcited by 241
- 2017Efficient Natural Language Response Suggestion for Smart Replycited by 228
- 2024InterrogateLLM: Zero-Resource Hallucination Detection in LLM-Generated Answerscited by 26
- 2023Weakly Supervised Detection of Hallucinations in LLM Activationscited by 20
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Knowledge Graphs as the Missing Data Layer for LLM-Based Industrial Asset Operations
- 2024Benchmarking pre-trained text embedding models in aligning built asset information
- 2025AssetOpsBench: Benchmarking AI Agents for Task Automation in Industrial Asset Operations and Maintenance
- 2025Bridging Industrial Expertise and XR with LLM-Powered Conversational Agents
- 2025Adaptation of Embedding Models to Financial Filings via LLM Distillation
- 2026Towards Trustworthy and Cost-Efficient Data Integration: From Na"ive RAG to Agentic RAG
- 2025Fine-Tuned Thoughts: Leveraging Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Industrial Asset Health Monitoring
- 2026LLM Agents Factory: Retrieval of Domain-Specific LLM Agents