Measuring multi-calibration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A suitable scalar metric can help measure multi-calibration, defined as follows. When the expected values of observed responses are equal to corresponding predicted probabilities, the probabilistic predictions are known as "perfectly calibrated." When the predicted probabilities are perfectly calibrated simultaneously across several subpopulations, the probabilistic predictions are known as "perfectly multi-calibrated." In practice, predicted probabilities are seldom perfectly multi-calibrated, so a statistic measuring the distance from perfect multi-calibration is informative. A recently proposed metric for calibration, based on the classical Kuiper statistic, is a natural basis for a new metric of multi-calibration and avoids well-known problems of metrics based on binning or kernel density estimation. The newly proposed metric weights the contributions of different subpopulations in proportion to their signal-to-noise ratios; data analyses' ablations demonstrate that the metric becomes noisy when omitting the signal-to-noise ratios from the metric. Numerical examples on benchmark data sets illustrate the new metric.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2025.
Builds on
14 of 29 references.
References · 14
- 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 222
- 2023A Survey on Intersectional Fairness in Machine Learning: Notions, Mitigation, and Challengescited by 41
- 2022Metrics of calibration for probabilistic predictionscited by 32
- 2023Swap Agnostic Learning, or Characterizing Omniprediction via Multicalibrationcited by 31
- 2023A Unifying Perspective on Multi-Calibration: Game Dynamics for Multi-Objective Learningcited by 30
- 2020Sample Complexity of Uniform Convergence for Multicalibrationcited by 24
- 2022T-Cal: An optimal test for the calibration of predictive modelscited by 24
- 2024When is Multicalibration Post-Processing Necessary?cited by 18
- 2024Bridging Multicalibration and Out-of-distribution Generalization Beyond Covariate Shiftcited by 10
- 2022Fair admission risk prediction with proportional multicalibrationcited by 8
- 2022Calibration of P-values for calibration and for deviation of a subpopulation from the full populationcited by 4
- 2020Cumulative deviation of a subpopulation from the full populationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2026A CaLLM Judge is a Better Judge: Mitigating Bias in LLM-as-a-judge13 Oct 2026
- 2026Multicalibration for Unbiased Model-Based Prevalence Estimation23 Apr 2026
- 2025MCGrad: Multicalibration at Web Scale24 Sep 2025
- 2025Auditability and the Landscape of Distance to Multicalibration21 Sep 2025