Precise Zero-Shot Pointwise Ranking with LLMs through Post-Aggregated Global Context Information
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advancements have successfully harnessed the power of Large Language Models (LLMs) for zero-shot document ranking, exploring a variety of prompting strategies. Comparative approaches like pairwise and listwise achieve high effectiveness but are computationally intensive and thus less practical for larger-scale applications. Scoring-based pointwise approaches exhibit superior efficiency by independently and simultaneously generating the relevance scores for each candidate document. However, this independence ignores critical comparative insights between documents, resulting in inconsistent scoring and suboptimal performance. In this paper, we aim to improve the effectiveness of pointwise methods while preserving their efficiency through two key innovations: (1) We propose a novel Global-Consistent Comparative Pointwise Ranking (GCCP) strategy that incorporates global reference comparisons between each candidate and an anchor document to generate contrastive relevance scores. We strategically design the anchor document as a query-focused summary of pseudo-relevant candidates, which serves as an effective reference point by capturing the global context for document comparison. (2) These contrastive relevance scores can be efficiently Post-Aggregated with existing pointwise methods, seamlessly integrating essential Global Context information in a training-free manner (PAGC). Extensive experiments on the TREC DL and BEIR benchmark demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms previous pointwise methods while maintaining comparable efficiency. Our method also achieves competitive performance against comparative methods that require substantially more computational resources. More analyses further validate the efficacy of our anchor construction strategy.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2025.
Builds on
26 of 49 references.
References · 26
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,252
- 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,216
- 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 849
- 2022Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labelscited by 517
- 2020Document Ranking with a Pretrained Sequence-to-Sequence Modelcited by 376
- 2023Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agentscited by 360
- 2023Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Promptingcited by 307
- 2020Overview of the TREC 2019 deep learning trackcited by 286
- 2021Overview of the TREC 2020 deep learning trackcited by 196
- 2023Large language models can accurately predict searcher preferencescited by 131
14 more
- 2022RankT5: Fine-Tuning T5 for Text Ranking with Ranking Lossescited by 115
- 2023Beyond Yes and No: Improving Zero-Shot LLM Rankers via Scoring Fine-Grained Relevance Labelscited by 86
- 2023Perspectives on Large Language Models for Relevance Judgmentcited by 85
- 2023A Setwise Approach for Effective and Highly Efficient Zero-shot Ranking with Large Language Modelscited by 55
- 2023Can ChatGPT Write a Good Boolean Query for Systematic Review Literature Search?cited by 54
- 2024FIRST: Faster Improved Listwise Reranking with Single Token Decodingcited by 54
- 2024TourRank: Utilizing Large Language Models for Documents Ranking with a Tournament-Inspired Strategycited by 47
- 2023Neural Retrievers are Biased Towards LLM-Generated Contentcited by 38
- 2020SummPip: Unsupervised Multi-Document Summarization with Sentence Graph Compressioncited by 24
- 2024Leveraging LLMs for Unsupervised Dense Retriever Rankingcited by 19
- 2024Top-Down Partitioning for Efficient List-Wise Rankingcited by 13
- 2024Consolidating Ranking and Relevance Predictions of Large Language Models through Post-Processingcited by 9
- 2024An Investigation of Prompt Variations for Zero-shot LLM-based Rankerscited by 8
- 2024Improving Zero-shot LLM Re-Ranker with Risk Minimizationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.
6 papers.
- 2026Taxonomy of the Retrieval System Framework: Pitfalls and Paradigmscited by 4
- 2026RLPO: Residual Listwise Preference Optimization for Long-Context Review Rankingcited by 3
- 2025SRLF: An Agent-Driven Set-Wise Reflective Learning Framework for Sequential Recommendationcited by 1
- 2026R3-SQL: Ranking Reward and Resampling for Text-to-SQLcited by 1
- 2026When Do Anchor-Based Pointwise LLM Rerankers Help? Retriever Quality, Statistical Scope, and Anchor Designcited by 0
- 2026Replacing Training with Memory: Listwise Selection for Text-to-SQLcited by 0
- 2026Replacing Training with Memory: Listwise Selection for Text-to-SQL1 Sep 2026
- 2026When Do Anchor-Based Pointwise LLM Rerankers Help? Retriever Quality, Statistical Scope, and Anchor Design11 Aug 2026
- 2026R3-SQL: Ranking Reward and Resampling for Text-to-SQL28 Apr 2026
- 2026Taxonomy of the Retrieval System Framework: Pitfalls and Paradigms27 Jan 2026
- 2026RLPO: Residual Listwise Preference Optimization for Long-Context Review Ranking12 Jan 2026
- 2025SRLF: An Agent-Driven Set-Wise Reflective Learning Framework for Sequential Recommendation14 Nov 2025