mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automated Validation of Textual Constraints Against AutomationML via LLMs and SHACL

arXiv 2506.10678 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2025cs.AI cs.SY eess.SYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AutomationML (AML) enables standardized data exchange in engineering, yet existing recommendations for proper AML modeling are typically formulated as informal and textual constraints. These constraints cannot be validated automatically within AML itself. This work-in-progress paper introduces a pipeline to formalize and verify such constraints. First, AML models are mapped to OWL ontologies via RML and SPARQL. In addition, a Large Language Model translates textual rules into SHACL constraints, which are then validated against the previously generated AML ontology. Finally, SHACL validation results are automatically interpreted in natural language. The approach is demonstrated on a sample AML recommendation. Results show that even complex modeling rules can be semi-automatically checked -- without requiring users to understand formal methods or ontology technologies.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2025.

Builds on

1 of 10 references.

References · 1

  1. 2025Automatic Mapping of AutomationML Files to Ontologies for Graph Queries and Validationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.