mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Aspect-Based Opinion Summarization with Argumentation Schemes

arXiv 2506.09917 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2025cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reviews are valuable resources for customers making purchase decisions in online shopping. However, it is impractical for customers to go over the vast number of reviews and manually conclude the prominent opinions, which prompts the need for automated opinion summarization systems. Previous approaches, either extractive or abstractive, face challenges in automatically producing grounded aspect-centric summaries. In this paper, we propose a novel summarization system that not only captures predominant opinions from an aspect perspective with supporting evidence, but also adapts to varying domains without relying on a pre-defined set of aspects. Our proposed framework, ASESUM, summarizes viewpoints relevant to the critical aspects of a product by extracting aspect-centric arguments and measuring their salience and validity. We conduct experiments on a real-world dataset to demonstrate the superiority of our approach in capturing diverse perspectives of the original reviews compared to new and existing methods.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2025.

Builds on

6 of 20 references.

References · 6

  1. 2021SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarizationcited by 407
  2. 2020Extractive Opinion Summarization in Quantized Transformer Spacescited by 76
  3. 2019Unsupervised Opinion Summarization as Copycat-Review Generationcited by 68
  4. 2021Aspect-Controllable Opinion Summarizationcited by 47
  5. 2021Learning Opinion Summarizers by Selecting Informative Reviewscited by 25
  6. 2024Prompted Aspect Key Point Analysis for Quantitative Review Summarizationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.