mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Stakeholder Participation for Responsible AI Development: Disconnects Between Guidance and Current Practice

arXiv 2506.09873 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2025cs.SE cs.AI cs.HCcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Responsible AI (rAI) guidance increasingly promotes stakeholder involvement (SHI) during AI development. At the same time, SHI is already common in commercial software development, but with potentially different foci. This study clarifies the extent to which established SHI practices are able to contribute to rAI efforts as well as potential disconnects -- essential insights to inform and tailor future interventions that further shift industry practice towards rAI efforts. First, we analysed 56 rAI guidance documents to identify why SHI is recommended (i.e. its expected benefits for rAI) and uncovered goals such as redistributing power, improving socio-technical understandings, anticipating risks, and enhancing public oversight. To understand why and how SHI is currently practised in commercial settings, we then conducted an online survey (n=130) and semi-structured interviews (n=10) with AI practitioners. Our findings reveal that SHI in practice is primarily driven by commercial priorities (e.g. customer value, compliance) and several factors currently discourage more rAI-aligned SHI practices. This suggests that established SHI practices are largely not contributing to rAI efforts. To address this disconnect, we propose interventions and research opportunities to advance rAI development in practice.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 120 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2025.

Builds on

19 of 120 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  2. 2022Power to the People? Opportunities and Challenges for Participatory AIcited by 138
  3. 2019Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AIcited by 135
  4. 2019The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelinescited by 129
  5. 2020Participation is not a Design Fix for Machine Learningcited by 111
  6. 2020Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Databasecited by 96
  7. 2023The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practicecited by 87
  8. 2019Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safetycited by 68
  9. 2020Where Responsible AI meets Reality: Practitioner Perspectives on Enablers for shifting Organizational Practicescited by 39
  10. 2024The illusion of artificial inclusioncited by 34
  11. 2021Reviewable Automated Decision-Making: A Framework for Accountable Algorithmic Systemscited by 31
  12. 2023Investigating How Practitioners Use Human-AI Guidelines: A Case Study on the People + AI Guidebookcited by 22
7 more
  1. 2022Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue: A Collection of Best Practices for AI Governance and Engineeringcited by 20
  2. 2021The Limits of Global Inclusion in AI Developmentcited by 14
  3. 2020Designing for Human Rights in AIcited by 13
  4. 2022Towards a multi-stakeholder value-based assessment framework for algorithmic systemscited by 12
  5. 2023Going public: the role of public participation approaches in commercial AI labscited by 11
  6. 2024Are We Asking the Right Questions?: Designing for Community Stakeholders' Interactions with AI in Policingcited by 10
  7. 2019Ethically Aligned Design of Autonomous Systems: Industry viewpoint and an empirical studycited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.