Inherited or produced? Inferring protein production kinetics when protein counts are shaped by a cell's division history
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Inferring protein production kinetics for dividing cells is complicated due to protein inheritance from the mother cell. For instance, fluorescence measurements -- commonly used to assess gene activation -- may reflect not only newly produced proteins but also those inherited through successive cell divisions. In such cases, observed protein levels in any given cell are shaped by its division history. As a case study, we examine activation of the glc3 gene in yeast involved in glycogen synthesis and expressed under nutrient-limiting conditions. We monitor this activity using snapshot fluorescence measurements via flow cytometry, where GFP expression reflects glc3 promoter activity. A na"ive analysis of flow cytometry data ignoring cell division suggests many cells are active with low expression. Explicitly accounting for the (non-Markovian) effects of cell division and protein inheritance makes it impossible to write down a tractable likelihood -- a key ingredient in physics-inspired inference, defining the probability of observing data given a model. The dependence on a cell's division history breaks the assumptions of standard (Markovian) master equations, rendering traditional likelihood-based approaches inapplicable. Instead, we adapt conditional normalizing flows (a class of neural network models designed to learn probability distributions) to approximate otherwise intractable likelihoods from simulated data. In doing so, we find that glc3 is mostly inactive under stress, showing that while cells occasionally activate the gene, expression is brief and transient.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 91 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2025.
Builds on
19 of 91 references.
References · 19
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,028
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,163
- 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,317
- 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 680
- 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 590
- 2019The frontier of simulation-based inferencecited by 492
- 2018Sequential Neural Likelihood: Fast Likelihood-free Inference with Autoregressive Flowscited by 217
- 2019Automatic Posterior Transformation for Likelihood-Free Inferencecited by 216
- 2019Learning Likelihoods with Conditional Normalizing Flowscited by 171
- 2023Flow Matching for Scalable Simulation-Based Inferencecited by 100
- 2024Normalizing Flows are Capable Generative Modelscited by 89
- 2023normflows: A PyTorch Package for Normalizing Flowscited by 56
7 more
- 2018Conditional Density Estimation with Bayesian Normalising Flowscited by 54
- 2018Cognitive computational neurosciencecited by 43
- 2023Sampling with flows, diffusion and autoregressive neural networks: A spin-glass perspectivecited by 26
- 2023Calibrating Neural Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable Coverage Probabilitycited by 10
- 2024Unifying Simulation and Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 6
- 2025Avoiding subtraction and division of stochastic signals using normalizing flows: NFdeconvolvecited by 2
- 2016Approximation and inference methods for stochastic biochemical kinetics - a tutorial reviewcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.