Breaking the ICE: Exploring promises and challenges of benchmarks for Inference Carbon & Energy estimation for LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While Generative AI stands to be one of the fastest adopted technologies ever, studies have made evident that the usage of Large Language Models (LLMs) puts significant burden on energy grids and our environment. It may prove a hindrance to the Sustainability goals of any organization. A crucial step in any Sustainability strategy is monitoring or estimating the energy consumption of various components. While there exist multiple tools for monitoring energy consumption, there is a dearth of tools/frameworks for estimating the consumption or carbon emissions. Current drawbacks of both monitoring and estimation tools include high input data points, intrusive nature, high error margin, etc. We posit that leveraging emerging LLM benchmarks and related data points can help overcome aforementioned challenges while balancing accuracy of the emission estimations. To that extent, we discuss the challenges of current approaches and present our evolving framework, R-ICE, which estimates prompt level inference carbon emissions by leveraging existing state-of-the-art(SOTA) benchmark. This direction provides a more practical and non-intrusive way to enable emerging use-cases like dynamic LLM routing, carbon accounting, etc. Our promising validation results suggest that benchmark-based modelling holds great potential for inference emission estimation and warrants further exploration from the scientific community.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2025.
Builds on
9 of 15 references.
References · 9
- 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,673
- 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
- 2019Green AIcited by 627
- 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 521
- 2022Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Modelcited by 265
- 2022The Carbon Footprint of Machine Learning Training Will Plateau, Then Shrinkcited by 184
- 2023LLMCarbon: Modeling the end-to-end Carbon Footprint of Large Language Modelscited by 72
- 2022Eco2AI: carbon emissions tracking of machine learning models as the first step towards sustainable AIcited by 58
- 2024Beyond Efficiency: Scaling AI Sustainablycited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.