TokenBreak: Bypassing Text Classification Models Through Token Manipulation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Natural Language Processing (NLP) models are used for text-related tasks such as classification and generation. To complete these tasks, input data is first tokenized from human-readable text into a format the model can understand, enabling it to make inferences and understand context. Text classification models can be implemented to guard against threats such as prompt injection attacks against Large Language Models (LLMs), toxic input and cybersecurity risks such as spam emails. In this paper, we introduce TokenBreak: a novel attack that can bypass these protection models by taking advantage of the tokenization strategy they use. This attack technique manipulates input text in such a way that certain models give an incorrect classification. Importantly, the end target (LLM or email recipient) can still understand and respond to the manipulated text and therefore be vulnerable to the very attack the protection model was put in place to prevent. The tokenizer is tied to model architecture, meaning it is possible to predict whether or not a model is vulnerable to attack based on family. We also present a defensive strategy as an added layer of protection that can be implemented without having to retrain the defensive model.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2025.
Builds on
6 of 16 references.
References · 6
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
- 2018Black-box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifierscited by 345
- 2017Synthetic and Natural Noise Both Break Neural Machine Translationcited by 306
- 2025ShadowGenes: Leveraging Recurring Patterns within Computational Graphs for Model Genealogycited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Broken-Token: Filtering Obfuscated Prompts by Counting Characters-Per-Token
- 2024Defense Against Syntactic Textual Backdoor Attacks with Token Substitution
- 2025MetaBreak: Jailbreaking Online LLM Services via Special Token Manipulation
- 2026The Tokens Remember: When Tokenization Bypasses Knowledge Editing and Unlearning
- 2026CLASP: Defending Hybrid Large Language Models Against Hidden State Poisoning Attacks
- 2025Tokens for Learning, Tokens for Unlearning: Mitigating Membership Inference Attacks in Large Language Models via Dual-Purpose Training
- 2025A Survey on Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models
- 2025Membership Inference Attacks on Tokenizers of Large Language Models