mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Boosting Vulnerability Detection of LLMs via Curriculum Preference Optimization with Synthetic Reasoning Data

arXiv 2506.07390 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2025cs.AI cs.SEcited by 8

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate considerable proficiency in numerous coding-related tasks; however, their capabilities in detecting software vulnerabilities remain limited. This limitation primarily stems from two factors: (1) the absence of reasoning data related to vulnerabilities, which hinders the models' ability to capture underlying vulnerability patterns; and (2) their focus on learning semantic representations rather than the reason behind them, thus failing to recognize semantically similar vulnerability samples. Furthermore, the development of LLMs specialized in vulnerability detection is challenging, particularly in environments characterized by the scarcity of high-quality datasets. In this paper, we propose a novel framework ReVD that excels at mining vulnerability patterns through reasoning data synthesizing and vulnerability-specific preference optimization. Specifically, we construct forward and backward reasoning processes for vulnerability and corresponding fixed code, ensuring the synthesis of high-quality reasoning data. Moreover, we design the triplet supervised fine-tuning followed by curriculum online preference optimization for enabling ReVD to better understand vulnerability patterns. The extensive experiments conducted on PrimeVul and SVEN datasets demonstrate that ReVD sets new state-of-the-art for LLM-based software vulnerability detection, e.g., 12.24%-22.77% improvement in the accuracy. The source code and data are available at https://github.com/Xin-Cheng-Wen/PO4Vul.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 5 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2025.

Builds on

5 of 55 references.

References · 5

  1. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  2. 2023ChatGPT for Vulnerability Detection, Classification, and Repair: How Far Are We?cited by 44
  3. 2024CodeDPO: Aligning Code Models with Self Generated and Verified Source Codecited by 34
  4. 2025MM-IQ: Benchmarking Human-Like Abstraction and Reasoning in Multimodal Modelscited by 29
  5. 2024System-2 Mathematical Reasoning via Enriched Instruction Tuningcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024LLM4Vuln: A Unified Evaluation Framework for Decoupling and Enhancing LLMs' Vulnerability Reasoning
  2. 2024To Err is Machine: Vulnerability Detection Challenges LLM Reasoning
  3. 2026Do Fine-Tuned LLMs Understand Vulnerabilities? An Investigation into the Semantic Trap
  4. 2025VulInstruct: Teaching LLMs Root-Cause Reasoning for Vulnerability Detection via Security Specifications
  5. 2025SV-TrustEval-C: Evaluating Structure and Semantic Reasoning in Large Language Models for Source Code Vulnerability Analysis
  6. 2024Towards Explainable Vulnerability Detection with Large Language Models
  7. 2026VulTriage: Triple-Path Context Augmentation for LLM-Based Vulnerability Detection
  8. 2025Reasoning with LLMs for Zero-Shot Vulnerability Detection