LLM-D12: A Dual-Dimensional Scale of Instrumental and Relational Dependencies on Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There is growing interest in understanding how people interact with large language models (LLMs) and whether such models elicit dependency or even addictive behaviour. Validated tools to assess the extent to which individuals may become dependent on LLMs are scarce and primarily build on classic behavioral addiction symptoms, adapted to the context of LLM use. We view this as a conceptual limitation, as the LLM-human relationship is more nuanced and warrants a fresh and distinct perspective. To address this gap, we developed and validated a new 12-item questionnaire to measure LLM dependency, referred to as LLM-D12. The scale was based on the authors' prior theoretical work, with items developed accordingly and responses collected from 526 participants in the UK. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, performed on separate halves of the total sample using a split-sample approach, supported a two-factor structure: Instrumental Dependency (six items) and Relationship Dependency (six items). Instrumental Dependency reflects the extent to which individuals rely on LLMs to support or collaborate in decision-making and cognitive tasks. Relationship Dependency captures the tendency to perceive LLMs as socially meaningful, sentient, or companion-like entities. The two-factor structure demonstrated excellent internal consistency and clear discriminant validity. External validation confirmed both the conceptual foundation and the distinction between the two subscales. The psychometric properties and structure of our LLM-D12 scale were interpreted in light of the emerging view that dependency on LLMs does not necessarily indicate dysfunction but may still reflect reliance levels that could become problematic in certain contexts.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 116 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2025.
Builds on
9 of 116 references.
References · 9
- 2024TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Modelscited by 285
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models in Theory of Mind Taskscited by 222
- 2024The opportunities and risks of large language models in mental healthcited by 54
- 2022Trust in AI and Its Role in the Acceptance of AI Technologiescited by 29
- 2021Human-AI Interactions in Public Sector Decision-Making: "Automation Bias" and "Selective Adherence" to Algorithmic Advicecited by 22
- 2023Inducing anxiety in large language models can induce biascited by 10
- 2025Longitudinal Study on Social and Emotional Use of AI Conversational Agentcited by 10
- 2025Generative Artificial Intelligence: Evolving Technology, Growing Societal Impact, and Opportunities for Information Systems Researchcited by 4
- 2016Network Psychometricscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Brief chatbot interactions produce lasting changes in human moral valuescited by 1
- 2026"Oops! ChatGPT is Temporarily Unavailable!": A Diary Study on Knowledge Workers' Experiences of LLM Withdrawalcited by 0
- 2026Mapping generative AI use in the human brain: divergent neural, academic, and mental health profiles of functional versus socio emotional AI usecited by 0
- 2026Brief chatbot interactions produce lasting changes in human moral values23 Apr 2026
- 2026Mapping generative AI use in the human brain: divergent neural, academic, and mental health profiles of functional versus socio emotional AI use2 Apr 2026
- 2026"Oops! ChatGPT is Temporarily Unavailable!": A Diary Study on Knowledge Workers' Experiences of LLM Withdrawal27 Mar 2026