Precise Information Control in Long-Form Text Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A central challenge in language models (LMs) is faithfulness hallucination: the generation of information unsubstantiated by input context. To study this problem, we propose Precise Information Control (PIC), a new task formulation that requires models to generate long-form outputs grounded in a provided set of short self-contained statements, without adding any unsupported ones. PIC includes a full setting that tests a model's ability to include exactly all input claims, and a partial setting that requires the model to selectively incorporate only relevant claims. We present PIC-Bench, a benchmark of eight long-form generation tasks (e.g., summarization, biography generation) adapted to the PIC setting, where LMs are supplied with well-formed, verifiable input claims. Our evaluation of a range of open and proprietary LMs on PIC-Bench reveals that, surprisingly, state-of-the-art LMs still hallucinate against user-provided input in over 70% of generations. To alleviate this lack of faithfulness, we introduce a post-training framework that uses a weakly supervised preference data construction method to train an 8B PIC-LM with stronger PIC ability--improving from 69.1% to 91.0% F1 in the full PIC setting. When integrated into end-to-end factual generation pipelines, PIC-LM improves exact match recall by 17.1% on ambiguous QA with retrieval, and factual precision by 30.5% on a birthplace fact-checking task, underscoring the potential of precisely grounded generation.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.
6 papers.
- 2025Characterizing Deep Research: A Benchmark and Formal Definitioncited by 30
- 2026HalluHard: A Hard Multi-Turn Hallucination Benchmarkcited by 9
- 2026Deep-Reporter: Deep Research for Grounded Multimodal Long-Form Generationcited by 4
- 2026Do Reasoning LLMs Refuse What They Infer in Long Contexts?cited by 3
- 2026Who is the Agent to Blame? Localizing Faithfulness and Citation Mistakes in Agentic Deep Researchcited by 1
- 2026IS-CoT: Breaking the Long-form Generation Collapse via Interleaved Structural Thinkingcited by 0
- 2026Who is the Agent to Blame? Localizing Faithfulness and Citation Mistakes in Agentic Deep Research25 Aug 2026
- 2026IS-CoT: Breaking the Long-form Generation Collapse via Interleaved Structural Thinking8 Jun 2026
- 2026Deep-Reporter: Deep Research for Grounded Multimodal Long-Form Generation12 Apr 2026
- 2026Do Reasoning LLMs Refuse What They Infer in Long Contexts?9 Feb 2026
- 2026HalluHard: A Hard Multi-Turn Hallucination Benchmark1 Feb 2026
- 2025Characterizing Deep Research: A Benchmark and Formal Definition6 Aug 2025