Selective Matching Losses -- Not All Scores Are Created Equal
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning systems match predicted scores to observations over some domain. Often, it is critical to produce accurate predictions in some subset (or region) of the domain, yet less important to accurately predict in other regions. We construct selective matching loss functions by design of increasing link functions over score domains. A matching loss is an integral over the link. A link defines loss sensitivity as function of the score, emphasizing high slope high sensitivity regions over flat ones. Loss asymmetry drives a model and resolves its underspecification to predict better in high sensitivity regions where it is more important, and to distinguish between high and low importance regions. A large variety of selective scalar losses can be designed with scaled and shifted Sigmoid and hyperbolic sine links. Their properties, however, do not extend to multi-class. Applying them per dimension lacks ranking sensitivity that assigns importance according to class score ranking. Utilizing composite Softmax functions, we develop a framework for multidimensional selective losses. We overcome limitations of the standard Softmax function, that is good for classification, but not for distinction between adjacent scores. Selective losses have substantial advantage over traditional losses in applications with more important score regions, including dwell-time prediction, retrieval, ranking with either pointwise, contrastive pairwise, or listwise losses, distillation problems, and fine-tuning alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs).
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2025.
Builds on
11 of 35 references.
References · 11
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2019Robust Bi-Tempered Logistic Loss Based on Bregman Divergencescited by 61
- 2020Smooth activations and reproducibility in deep networkscited by 15
- 2021LocoProp: Enhancing BackProp via Local Loss Optimizationcited by 15
- 2016Online Learning to Rank with Top-k Feedbackcited by 7
- 2020Supervised Learning: No Loss No Crycited by 7
- 2022Real World Large Scale Recommendation Systems Reproducibility and Smooth Activationscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Know When to Abstain: Optimal Selective Classification with Likelihood Ratios
- 2025Denoising Score Matching with Random Features: Insights on Diffusion Models from Precise Learning Curves
- 2025A Connection Between Score Matching and Local Intrinsic Dimension
- 2023Loss Functions and Metrics in Deep Learning
- 2025Optimizing What Matters: AUC-Driven Learning for Robust Neural Retrieval
- 2025Convergence Dynamics of Over-Parameterized Score Matching for a Single Gaussian
- 2025Diffusion Models and the Manifold Hypothesis: Log-Domain Smoothing is Geometry Adaptive
- 2026Asymptotic Learning Curves for Diffusion Models with Random Features Score and Manifold Data