mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Prompt Candidates, then Distill: A Teacher-Student Framework for LLM-driven Data Annotation

arXiv 2506.03857 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.CLcited by 5

On the map: Knowledge distillation → Knowledge distillation for LLMs

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential for data annotation, markedly reducing the labor costs associated with downstream applications. However, existing methods mostly adopt an aggressive strategy by prompting LLM to determine a single gold label for each unlabeled sample. Due to the inherent uncertainty within LLMs, they often produce incorrect labels for difficult samples, severely compromising the data quality for downstream applications. Motivated by ambiguity aversion in human behaviors, we propose a novel candidate annotation paradigm wherein large language models are encouraged to output all possible labels when incurring uncertainty. To ensure unique labels are provided for downstream tasks, we develop a teacher-student framework CanDist that distills candidate annotations with a Small Language Model (SLM). We further provide a rigorous justification demonstrating that distilling candidate annotations from the teacher LLM offers superior theoretical guarantees compared to directly using single annotations. Extensive experiments across six text classification tasks validate the effectiveness of our proposed method. The source code is available at https://github.com/MingxuanXia/CanDist.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge distillation for LLMs, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation. Builds on 45 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2025.

Builds on

45 of 65 references.

References · 45

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  5. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  6. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  7. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  8. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  9. 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,565
  10. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,392
  11. 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,256
  12. 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,195
33 more
  1. 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
  2. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  3. 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 974
  4. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 870
  5. 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 812
  6. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 788
  7. 2020Efficient Intent Detection with Dual Sentence Encoderscited by 433
  8. 2022Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoningcited by 388
  9. 2024On LLMs-Driven Synthetic Data Generation, Curation, and Evaluation: A Surveycited by 244
  10. 2022Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?cited by 208
  11. 2024Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Surveycited by 205
  12. 2023Universal Self-Consistency for Large Language Model Generationcited by 203
  13. 2023AnnoLLM: Making Large Language Models to Be Better Crowdsourced Annotatorscited by 172
  14. 2019Text Classification Algorithms: A Surveycited by 163
  15. 2021Constrained Language Models Yield Few-Shot Semantic Parserscited by 163
  16. 2021Towards Understanding Knowledge Distillationcited by 158
  17. 2021Active Learning by Acquiring Contrastive Examplescited by 156
  18. 2023Large Language Model Cascades with Mixture of Thoughts Representations for Cost-efficient Reasoningcited by 143
  19. 2017PubMed 200k RCT: a Dataset for Sequential Sentence Classification in Medical Abstractscited by 124
  20. 2021Generate & Rank: A Multi-task Framework for Math Word Problemscited by 82
  21. 2024Self-Alignment for Factuality: Mitigating Hallucinations in LLMs via Self-Evaluationcited by 80
  22. 2024Self-Contrast: Better Reflection Through Inconsistent Solving Perspectivescited by 71
  23. 2022Prompt Consistency for Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 67
  24. 2024SuRe: Summarizing Retrievals using Answer Candidates for Open-domain QA of LLMscited by 67
  25. 2022Evaluating Unsupervised Text Classification: Zero-shot and Similarity-based Approachescited by 39
  26. 2022Is BERT Robust to Label Noise? A Study on Learning with Noisy Labels in Text Classificationcited by 21
  27. 2023Understanding Self-Distillation in the Presence of Label Noisecited by 21
  28. 2023Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learnerscited by 20
  29. 2024GPTs Are Multilingual Annotators for Sequence Generation Taskscited by 11
  30. 2025Hide and Seek in Noise Labels: Noise-Robust Collaborative Active Learning with LLM-Powered Assistancecited by 11
  31. 2024Zero-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities of Large Language Models Iteratively without Gold Labelscited by 4
  32. 2024Human-LLM Hybrid Text Answer Aggregation for Crowd Annotationscited by 4
  33. 2024Rethinking Self-Distillation: Label Averaging and Enhanced Soft Label Refinement with Partial Labelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025From LLM-anation to LLM-orchestrator: Coordinating Small Models for Data Labeling
  2. 2024Knowledge Distillation in Automated Annotation: Supervised Text Classification with LLM-Generated Training Labels
  3. 2026Optimizing LLM Annotation of Classroom Discourse through Multi-Agent Orchestration
  4. 2024Learning with Less: Knowledge Distillation from Large Language Models via Unlabeled Data
  5. 2025Users as Annotators: LLM Preference Learning from Comparison Mode
  6. 2023Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizes
  7. 2025The Alternative Annotator Test for LLM-as-a-Judge: How to Statistically Justify Replacing Human Annotators with LLMs
  8. 2024Under the Surface: Tracking the Artifactuality of LLM-Generated Data