From Understanding to Generation: An Efficient Shortcut for Evaluating Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Iterative evaluation of LLMs during training is essential to ensure expected capability development, but can be time- and compute-intensive. While NLU tasks, where the model selects from fixed answer choices, are cheap to evaluate, essential capabilities like reasoning and code generation rely on the more time-consuming NLG (token-by-token generation) format. In this work, our aim is to decrease the computational burden of NLG benchmarks in order to enable monitoring crucial LLM capabilities during model training. We reformulate generative tasks into computationally cheaper NLU alternatives. We test the performance correlation between the original and reformulated tasks using 8 LMs of various sizes and 4 capabilities: mathematical reasoning, code generation, factual knowledge and reading comprehension. Our results show a strong correlation between task formats, supporting capability assessment via cheaper alternatives and achieving over 35x average reduction in evaluation time. Our project is available at: https://github.com/Fraunhofer-IIS/EvalShortcut
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2025.
Builds on
18 of 31 references.
References · 18
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
- 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,554
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2023SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehensioncited by 940
- 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 613
- 2020UnifiedQA: Crossing Format Boundaries With a Single QA Systemcited by 476
- 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 398
- 2024tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplescited by 310
6 more
- 2024Lessons from the Trenches on Reproducible Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 179
- 2024OLMES: A Standard for Language Model Evaluationscited by 106
- 2024Open-LLM-Leaderboard: From Multi-choice to Open-style Questions for LLMs Evaluation, Benchmark, and Arenacited by 76
- 2024Why Has Predicting Downstream Capabilities of Frontier AI Models with Scale Remained Elusive?cited by 40
- 2022Deconstructing NLG Evaluation: Evaluation Practices, Assumptions, and Their Implicationscited by 32
- 2024Multiple-Choice Questions are Efficient and Robust LLM Evaluatorscited by 28
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024A Systematic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Natural Language Generation Tasks
- 2024Enhancing LLM Evaluations: The Garbling Trick
- 2023L2CEval: Evaluating Language-to-Code Generation Capabilities of Large Language Models
- 2023Exploring the Reliability of Large Language Models as Customized Evaluators for Diverse NLP Tasks
- 2024Evaluating Language Models as Synthetic Data Generators
- 2024LLMs' Understanding of Natural Language Revealed
- 2025Encyclo-K: Evaluating LLMs with Dynamically Composed Knowledge Statements
- 2024The Future of Learning in the Age of Generative AI: Automated Question Generation and Assessment with Large Language Models