Theoretical Performance Guarantees for Partial Domain Adaptation via Partial Optimal Transport
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In many scenarios of practical interest, labeled data from a target distribution are scarce while labeled data from a related source distribution are abundant. One particular setting of interest arises when the target label space is a subset of the source label space, leading to the framework of partial domain adaptation (PDA). Typical approaches to PDA involve minimizing a domain alignment term and a weighted empirical loss on the source data, with the aim of transferring knowledge between domains. However, a theoretical basis for this procedure is lacking, and in particular, most existing weighting schemes are heuristic. In this work, we derive generalization bounds for the PDA problem based on partial optimal transport. These bounds corroborate the use of the partial Wasserstein distance as a domain alignment term, and lead to theoretically motivated explicit expressions for the empirical source loss weights. Inspired by these bounds, we devise a practical algorithm for PDA, termed WARMPOT. Through extensive numerical experiments, we show that WARMPOT is competitive with recent approaches, and that our proposed weights improve on existing schemes.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2025.
Builds on
31 of 56 references.
References · 31
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
- 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,329
- 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,311
- 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,188
- 2015Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptationcited by 463
- 2018Detecting and Correcting for Label Shift with Black Box Predictorscited by 366
- 2020A Brief Review of Domain Adaptationcited by 288
- 2017Joint Distribution Optimal Transportation for Domain Adaptationcited by 282
- 2021User-friendly introduction to PAC-Bayes boundscited by 239
19 more
- 2019Uniform convergence may be unable to explain generalization in deep learningcited by 224
- 2018DeepJDOT: Deep Joint Distribution Optimal Transport for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 214
- 2020Source Data-absent Unsupervised Domain Adaptation through Hypothesis Transfer and Labeling Transfercited by 173
- 2018Partial Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 127
- 2020Domain Adaptation with Conditional Distribution Matching and Generalized Label Shiftcited by 125
- 2016Theoretical Analysis of Domain Adaptation with Optimal Transportcited by 105
- 2018Importance Weighted Adversarial Nets for Partial Domain Adaptationcited by 90
- 2019Learning to Transfer Examples for Partial Domain Adaptationcited by 87
- 2023Generalization Bounds: Perspectives from Information Theory and PAC-Bayescited by 61
- 2022Unified Optimal Transport Framework for Universal Domain Adaptationcited by 57
- 2020A Balanced and Uncertainty-aware Approach for Partial Domain Adaptationcited by 55
- 2020Deep Residual Correction Network for Partial Domain Adaptationcited by 45
- 2021Improving Mini-batch Optimal Transport via Partial Transportationcited by 41
- 2020Select, Label, and Mix: Learning Discriminative Invariant Feature Representations for Partial Domain Adaptationcited by 16
- 2021Partial Domain Adaptation without Domain Alignmentcited by 11
- 2022From Big to Small: Adaptive Learning to Partial-Set Domainscited by 9
- 2022Partial Wasserstein Adversarial Network for Non-rigid Point Set Registrationcited by 5
- 2024When Invariant Representation Learning Meets Label Shift: Insufficiency and Theoretical Insightscited by 2
- 2024Partial Distribution Matching via Partial Wasserstein Adversarial Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.