MidPO: Dual Preference Optimization for Safety and Helpfulness in Large Language Models via a Mixture of Experts Framework
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied across various domains, enhancing safety while maintaining the helpfulness of LLMs has become a critical challenge. Recent studies solve this problem through safety-constrained online preference optimization or safety-constrained offline preference optimization. However, the safety-constrained online methods often suffer from excessive safety, which might reduce helpfulness, while the safety-constrained offline methods perform poorly in adaptively balancing safety and helpfulness. To address these limitations, we propose MidPO, a textbfunderlineMixture of Experts (MoE) framework for safety-helpfulness textbfunderlinedual textbfunderlinePreference textbfunderlineOptimization. Firstly, MidPO devises single-preference enhanced direct preference optimization approach to transform the base model into two independent experts, termed safety and helpfulness experts, and fine-tunes the two independent experts for optimal safety or helpfulness performance. Secondly, to achieve an effective balance between safety and helpfulness, MidPO incorporates the two experts into the MoE framework and designs a dynamic routing mechanism to allocate contributions from each expert adaptively. We conduct quantitative and qualitative experiments on three popular datasets to demonstrate the proposed MidPO significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in both safety and helpfulness. The code and models will be released.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 18 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2025.
Builds on
18 of 38 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Rule Based Rewards for Language Model Safety2 Nov
- 2024PKU-SafeRLHF: Towards Multi-Level Safety Alignment for LLMs with Human Preference20 Jun
- 2024OR-Bench: An Over-Refusal Benchmark for Large Language Models31 May
Other references · 15
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
- 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,785
- 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,218
- 2024DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligencecited by 1,154
- 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Reportcited by 724
- 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 672
- 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Mergingcited by 271
- 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 194
- 2024Merging Multi-Task Models via Weight-Ensembling Mixture of Expertscited by 85
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Safe to Serve: Aligning Instruction-Tuned Models for Safety and Helpfulness
- 2025SafeDPO: A Simple Approach to Direct Preference Optimization with Enhanced Safety
- 2026Suan: Rectifying Direct Preference Safety Alignment in Large Language Models
- 2026Cat-DPO: Category-Adaptive Safety Alignment
- 2026Improving Safety Alignment via Balanced Direct Preference Optimization
- 2025Safe at the Margins: A General Approach to Safety Alignment in Low-Resource English Languages -- A Singlish Case Study
- 2025Equilibrate RLHF: Towards Balancing Helpfulness-Safety Trade-off in Large Language Models
- 2025InfoPO: On Mutual Information Maximization for Large Language Model Alignment